view tests/test-confused-revert.t @ 23062:ba89f7b542c9 stable

revset: have rev() drop out-of-range or filtered rev explicitly (issue4396)

The recent optimization of "and" operation relies on the assumption that
the rhs set does not contain invalid revisions.  So rev() has to remove
invalid revisions.

This is still faster than using `.filter(lambda r: r == l)`.

revset #0: rev(25)
0) wall 0.026341 comb 0.020000 user 0.020000 sys 0.000000 (best of 113)
1) wall 0.000038 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 66567)
2) wall 0.000062 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 43699)
(0: bbf4f3dfd700^, 1: 3.2-rc, 2: this patch)

  $ hg init
  $ echo foo > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg commit -m "1"

  $ echo bar > b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg remove a

Should show a removed and b added:

  $ hg status
  A b
  R a

  $ hg revert --all
  undeleting a
  forgetting b

Should show b unknown and a back to normal:

  $ hg status
  ? b

  $ rm b

  $ hg co -C 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo foo-a > a
  $ hg commit -m "2a"

  $ hg co -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo foo-b > a
  $ hg commit -m "2b"
  created new head

  $ HGMERGE=true hg merge 1
  merging a
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

Should show foo-b:

  $ cat a
  foo-b

  $ echo bar > b
  $ hg add b
  $ rm a
  $ hg remove a

Should show a removed and b added:

  $ hg status
  A b
  R a

Revert should fail:

  $ hg revert
  abort: uncommitted merge with no revision specified
  (use "hg update" or see "hg help revert")
  [255]

Revert should be ok now:

  $ hg revert -r2 --all
  undeleting a
  forgetting b

Should show b unknown and a marked modified (merged):

  $ hg status
  M a
  ? b

Should show foo-b:

  $ cat a
  foo-b