Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-patch.t @ 23062:ba89f7b542c9 stable
revset: have rev() drop out-of-range or filtered rev explicitly (issue4396)
The recent optimization of "and" operation relies on the assumption that
the rhs set does not contain invalid revisions. So rev() has to remove
invalid revisions.
This is still faster than using `.filter(lambda r: r == l)`.
revset #0: rev(25)
0) wall 0.026341 comb 0.020000 user 0.020000 sys 0.000000 (best of 113)
1) wall 0.000038 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 66567)
2) wall 0.000062 comb 0.000000 user 0.000000 sys 0.000000 (best of 43699)
(0: bbf4f3dfd700^, 1: 3.2-rc, 2: this patch)
author | Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> |
---|---|
date | Sun, 19 Oct 2014 16:48:33 +0900 |
parents | 0705f2ac79d6 |
children | 75be14993fda |
line wrap: on
line source
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF > import sys > print 'Using custom patch' > if '--binary' in sys.argv: > print '--binary found !' > EOF $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo a > a $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0' adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0' $ cd .. This test checks that: - custom patch commands with arguments actually work - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance --binary is added by default under win32. check custom patch options are honored $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip $ hg clone -r 0 a b adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff applying ../a.diff Using custom patch applied to working directory Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description Prepare source repo and patch: $ rm $HGRCPATH $ hg init c $ cd c $ printf "a\rc" > a $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0' $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a $ cat << eof > log > first line which can't start with '# ' > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: > # HG changeset patch > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment > eof $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0' $ hg export -o p 1 $ cd .. Clone and apply patch: $ hg clone -r 0 c d adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd d $ hg import ../c/p applying ../c/p $ hg log -v -r 1 changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: a description: first line which can't start with '# ' # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: # HG changeset patch # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment $ cd ..