Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t @ 26755:bb0b955d050d
streamclone: support for producing and consuming stream clone bundles
Up to this point, stream clones only existed as a dynamically generated
data format produced and consumed during streaming clones. In order to
support this efficient cloning format with the clone bundles feature, we
need a more formal, on disk representation of the streaming clone data.
This patch introduces a new "bundle" type for streaming clones. Unlike
existing bundles, it does not contain changegroup data. It does,
however, share the same concepts like the 4 byte header which identifies
the type of data that follows and the 2 byte abbreviation for
compression types (of which only "UN" is currently supported).
The new bundle format is essentially the existing stream clone version 1
data format with some headers at the beginning.
Content negotiation at stream clone request time checked for repository
format/requirements compatibility before initiating a stream clone. We
can't do active content negotiation when using clone bundles. So, we put
this set of requirements inside the payload so consumers have a built-in
mechanism for checking compatibility before reading and applying lots of
data. Of course, we will also advertise this requirements set in clone
bundles. But that's for another patch.
We currently don't have a mechanism to produce and consume this new
bundle format. This will be implemented in upcoming patches.
It's worth noting that if a legacy client attempts to `hg unbundle` a
stream clone bundle (with the "HGS1" header), it will abort with:
"unknown bundle version S1," which seems appropriate.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 17 Oct 2015 11:14:52 -0700 |
parents | aa9385f983fa |
children | eb586ed5d8ce |
line wrap: on
line source
this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for changesets, so first we have to recreate it o 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 $ mkrev() > { > revno=$1 > echo "rev $revno" > echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt > hg -q ci -m"rev $revno" > } setup test repo1 $ hg init repo1 $ cd repo1 $ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt $ hg ci -Am"rev 0" adding foo.txt $ mkrev 1 rev 1 first branch $ mkrev 2 rev 2 $ mkrev 3 rev 3 back to rev 1 to create second branch $ hg up -r1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 4 rev 4 $ mkrev 5 rev 5 merge first branch to second branch $ hg up -C -r5 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt $ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch" one more commit following the merge $ mkrev 7 rev 7 back to "second branch" to make another head $ hg up -r5 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 8 rev 8 the story so far $ hg log -G --template "{rev}\n" @ 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2 adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2 comparing with ../repo2 searching for changes 4 5 6 7 8 test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it actually bundles 7 $ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2 searching for changes 5 changesets found test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too $ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle 5 changesets found $ cd ..