view contrib/base-revsets.txt @ 38336:bb7e3c6ef592

phabricator: preserve the phase when amending in the Differential fields

I have no idea if it's better to change scmutil.cleanupnodes() so that it has
the option to either apply a specific phase (e.g. for various --secret switches)
or carry over the phase of the old node.  The benefit would be that the caller
doesn't have to remember to do this.  The con is maybe inefficiency?  I wrote
this up as issue5918.  I'm leaving that open since Yuya flagged it as an API
bug.

Since most other callers already do this, it's the simplest fix.  (It's not
obvious that `split`, `fix` and `rebase` are doing this, but there is test
coverage for `fix` and `rebase`, and experimenting with `split` shows it does
the right thing.)

# Base Revsets to be used with revsetbenchmarks.py script
#
# The goal of this file is to gather a limited amount of revsets that allow a
# good coverage of the internal revsets mechanisms.  Revsets included should not
# be selected for their individual implementation, but for what they reveal of
# the internal implementation of smartsets classes (and their interactions).
#
# Use and update this file when you change internal implementation of these
# smartsets classes. Please include a comment explaining what each of your
# addition is testing. Also check if your changes to the smartset class makes
# some of the tests inadequate and replace them with a new one testing the same
# behavior.
#
# If you want to benchmark revsets predicate itself, check 'all-revsets.txt'.
#
# The current content of this file is currently likely not reaching this goal
# entirely, feel free, to audit its content and comment on each revset to
# highlight what internal mechanisms they test.

all()
draft()
::tip
draft() and ::tip
::tip and draft()
0::tip
roots(0::tip)
author(lmoscovicz)
author(mpm)
author(lmoscovicz) or author(mpm)
author(mpm) or author(lmoscovicz)
tip:0
0::
# those two `roots(...)` inputs are close to what phase movement use.
roots((tip~100::) - (tip~100::tip))
roots((0::) - (0::tip))
42:68 and roots(42:tip)
::p1(p1(tip))::
public()
:10000 and public()
draft()
:10000 and draft()
roots((0:tip)::)
(not public() - obsolete())
(_intlist('20000\x0020001')) and merge()
parents(20000)
(20000::) - (20000)
# The one below is used by rebase
(children(ancestor(tip~5, tip)) and ::(tip~5))::