Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-contrib.t @ 38732:be4984261611
merge: mark file gets as not thread safe (issue5933)
In default installs, this has the effect of disabling the thread-based
worker on Windows when manifesting files in the working directory. My
measurements have shown that with revlog-based repositories, Mercurial
spends a lot of CPU time in revlog code resolving file data. This ends
up incurring a lot of context switching across threads and slows down
`hg update` operations when going from an empty working directory to
the tip of the repo.
On mozilla-unified (246,351 files) on an i7-6700K (4+4 CPUs):
before: 487s wall
after: 360s wall (equivalent to worker.enabled=false)
cpus=2: 379s wall
Even with only 2 threads, the thread pool is still slower.
The introduction of the thread-based worker (02b36e860e0b) states that
it resulted in a "~50%" speedup for `hg sparse --enable-profile` and
`hg sparse --disable-profile`. This disagrees with my measurement
above. I theorize a few reasons for this:
1) Removal of files from the working directory is I/O - not CPU - bound
and should benefit from a thread pool (unless I/O is insanely fast
and the GIL release is near instantaneous). So tests like `hg sparse
--enable-profile` may exercise deletion throughput and aren't good
benchmarks for worker tasks that are CPU heavy.
2) The patch was authored by someone at Facebook. The results were
likely measured against a repository using remotefilelog. And I
believe that revision retrieval during working directory updates with
remotefilelog will often use a remote store, thus being I/O and not
CPU bound. This probably resulted in an overstated performance gain.
Since there appears to be a need to enable the thread-based worker with
some stores, I've made the flagging of file gets as thread safe
configurable. I've made it experimental because I don't want to formalize
a boolean flag for this option and because this attribute is best
captured against the store implementation. But we don't have a proper
store API for this yet. I'd rather cross this bridge later.
It is possible there are revlog-based repositories that do benefit from
a thread-based worker. I didn't do very comprehensive testing. If there
are, we may want to devise a more proper algorithm for whether to use
the thread-based worker, including possibly config options to limit the
number of threads to use. But until I see evidence that justifies
complexity, simplicity wins.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3963
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:49:34 -0700 |
parents | 567bddcb4271 |
children | 5abc47d4ca6b |
line wrap: on
line source
Set vars: $ CONTRIBDIR="$TESTDIR/../contrib" Test simplemerge command: $ cp "$CONTRIBDIR/simplemerge" . $ echo base > base $ echo local > local $ cat base >> local $ cp local orig $ cat base > other $ echo other >> other changing local directly $ $PYTHON simplemerge local base other && echo "merge succeeded" merge succeeded $ cat local local base other $ cp orig local printing to stdout $ $PYTHON simplemerge -p local base other local base other local: $ cat local local base conflicts $ cp base conflict-local $ cp other conflict-other $ echo not other >> conflict-local $ echo end >> conflict-local $ echo end >> conflict-other $ $PYTHON simplemerge -p conflict-local base conflict-other base <<<<<<< conflict-local not other ======= other >>>>>>> conflict-other end [1] 1 label $ $PYTHON simplemerge -p -L foo conflict-local base conflict-other base <<<<<<< foo not other ======= other >>>>>>> conflict-other end [1] 2 labels $ $PYTHON simplemerge -p -L foo -L bar conflict-local base conflict-other base <<<<<<< foo not other ======= other >>>>>>> bar end [1] 3 labels $ $PYTHON simplemerge -p -L foo -L bar -L base conflict-local base conflict-other base <<<<<<< foo not other end ||||||| base ======= other end >>>>>>> bar [1] too many labels $ $PYTHON simplemerge -p -L foo -L bar -L baz -L buz conflict-local base conflict-other abort: can only specify three labels. [255] binary file $ $PYTHON -c "f = open('binary-local', 'w'); f.write('\x00'); f.close()" $ cat orig >> binary-local $ $PYTHON simplemerge -p binary-local base other warning: binary-local looks like a binary file. [1] binary file --text $ $PYTHON simplemerge -a -p binary-local base other 2>&1 warning: binary-local looks like a binary file. \x00local (esc) base other help $ $PYTHON simplemerge --help simplemerge [OPTS] LOCAL BASE OTHER Simple three-way file merge utility with a minimal feature set. Apply to LOCAL the changes necessary to go from BASE to OTHER. By default, LOCAL is overwritten with the results of this operation. options: -L --label labels to use on conflict markers -a --text treat all files as text -p --print print results instead of overwriting LOCAL --no-minimal no effect (DEPRECATED) -h --help display help and exit -q --quiet suppress output wrong number of arguments $ $PYTHON simplemerge simplemerge: wrong number of arguments simplemerge [OPTS] LOCAL BASE OTHER Simple three-way file merge utility with a minimal feature set. Apply to LOCAL the changes necessary to go from BASE to OTHER. By default, LOCAL is overwritten with the results of this operation. options: -L --label labels to use on conflict markers -a --text treat all files as text -p --print print results instead of overwriting LOCAL --no-minimal no effect (DEPRECATED) -h --help display help and exit -q --quiet suppress output [1] bad option $ $PYTHON simplemerge --foo -p local base other simplemerge: option --foo not recognized simplemerge [OPTS] LOCAL BASE OTHER Simple three-way file merge utility with a minimal feature set. Apply to LOCAL the changes necessary to go from BASE to OTHER. By default, LOCAL is overwritten with the results of this operation. options: -L --label labels to use on conflict markers -a --text treat all files as text -p --print print results instead of overwriting LOCAL --no-minimal no effect (DEPRECATED) -h --help display help and exit -q --quiet suppress output [1]