view tests/test-convert-clonebranches.t @ 38732:be4984261611

merge: mark file gets as not thread safe (issue5933)

In default installs, this has the effect of disabling the thread-based
worker on Windows when manifesting files in the working directory. My
measurements have shown that with revlog-based repositories, Mercurial
spends a lot of CPU time in revlog code resolving file data. This ends
up incurring a lot of context switching across threads and slows down
`hg update` operations when going from an empty working directory to
the tip of the repo.

On mozilla-unified (246,351 files) on an i7-6700K (4+4 CPUs):

before: 487s wall
after:  360s wall (equivalent to worker.enabled=false)
cpus=2: 379s wall

Even with only 2 threads, the thread pool is still slower.

The introduction of the thread-based worker (02b36e860e0b) states that
it resulted in a "~50%" speedup for `hg sparse --enable-profile` and
`hg sparse --disable-profile`. This disagrees with my measurement
above. I theorize a few reasons for this:

1) Removal of files from the working directory is I/O - not CPU - bound
   and should benefit from a thread pool (unless I/O is insanely fast
   and the GIL release is near instantaneous). So tests like `hg sparse
   --enable-profile` may exercise deletion throughput and aren't good
   benchmarks for worker tasks that are CPU heavy.
2) The patch was authored by someone at Facebook. The results were
   likely measured against a repository using remotefilelog. And I
   believe that revision retrieval during working directory updates with
   remotefilelog will often use a remote store, thus being I/O and not
   CPU bound. This probably resulted in an overstated performance gain.

Since there appears to be a need to enable the thread-based worker with
some stores, I've made the flagging of file gets as thread safe
configurable. I've made it experimental because I don't want to formalize
a boolean flag for this option and because this attribute is best
captured against the store implementation. But we don't have a proper
store API for this yet. I'd rather cross this bridge later.

It is possible there are revlog-based repositories that do benefit from
a thread-based worker. I didn't do very comprehensive testing. If there
are, we may want to devise a more proper algorithm for whether to use
the thread-based worker, including possibly config options to limit the
number of threads to use. But until I see evidence that justifies
complexity, simplicity wins.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3963

  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [extensions]
  > convert =
  > [convert]
  > hg.tagsbranch = 0
  > EOF
  $ hg init source
  $ cd source
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg ci -qAm adda

Add a merge with one parent in the same branch

  $ echo a >> a
  $ hg ci -qAm changea
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ hg branch branch0
  marked working directory as branch branch0
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg ci -qAm addb
  $ hg up -qC
  $ hg merge default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -qm mergeab
  $ hg tag -ql mergeab
  $ cd ..

Miss perl... sometimes

  $ cat > filter.py <<EOF
  > from __future__ import absolute_import
  > import re
  > import sys
  > 
  > r = re.compile(r'^(?:\d+|pulling from)')
  > sys.stdout.writelines([l for l in sys.stdin if r.search(l)])
  > EOF

convert

  $ hg convert -v --config convert.hg.clonebranches=1 source dest |
  >     $PYTHON filter.py
  3 adda
  2 changea
  1 addb
  pulling from default into branch0
  1 changesets found
  0 mergeab
  pulling from default into branch0
  1 changesets found

Add a merge with both parents and child in different branches

  $ cd source
  $ hg branch branch1
  marked working directory as branch branch1
  $ echo a > file1
  $ hg ci -qAm c1
  $ hg up -qC mergeab
  $ hg branch branch2
  marked working directory as branch branch2
  $ echo a > file2
  $ hg ci -qAm c2
  $ hg merge branch1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg branch branch3
  marked working directory as branch branch3
  $ hg ci -qAm c3
  $ cd ..

incremental conversion

  $ hg convert -v --config convert.hg.clonebranches=1 source dest |
  >     $PYTHON filter.py
  2 c1
  pulling from branch0 into branch1
  4 changesets found
  1 c2
  pulling from branch0 into branch2
  4 changesets found
  0 c3
  pulling from branch1 into branch3
  5 changesets found
  pulling from branch2 into branch3
  1 changesets found