view tests/test-eol-update.t @ 38732:be4984261611

merge: mark file gets as not thread safe (issue5933) In default installs, this has the effect of disabling the thread-based worker on Windows when manifesting files in the working directory. My measurements have shown that with revlog-based repositories, Mercurial spends a lot of CPU time in revlog code resolving file data. This ends up incurring a lot of context switching across threads and slows down `hg update` operations when going from an empty working directory to the tip of the repo. On mozilla-unified (246,351 files) on an i7-6700K (4+4 CPUs): before: 487s wall after: 360s wall (equivalent to worker.enabled=false) cpus=2: 379s wall Even with only 2 threads, the thread pool is still slower. The introduction of the thread-based worker (02b36e860e0b) states that it resulted in a "~50%" speedup for `hg sparse --enable-profile` and `hg sparse --disable-profile`. This disagrees with my measurement above. I theorize a few reasons for this: 1) Removal of files from the working directory is I/O - not CPU - bound and should benefit from a thread pool (unless I/O is insanely fast and the GIL release is near instantaneous). So tests like `hg sparse --enable-profile` may exercise deletion throughput and aren't good benchmarks for worker tasks that are CPU heavy. 2) The patch was authored by someone at Facebook. The results were likely measured against a repository using remotefilelog. And I believe that revision retrieval during working directory updates with remotefilelog will often use a remote store, thus being I/O and not CPU bound. This probably resulted in an overstated performance gain. Since there appears to be a need to enable the thread-based worker with some stores, I've made the flagging of file gets as thread safe configurable. I've made it experimental because I don't want to formalize a boolean flag for this option and because this attribute is best captured against the store implementation. But we don't have a proper store API for this yet. I'd rather cross this bridge later. It is possible there are revlog-based repositories that do benefit from a thread-based worker. I didn't do very comprehensive testing. If there are, we may want to devise a more proper algorithm for whether to use the thread-based worker, including possibly config options to limit the number of threads to use. But until I see evidence that justifies complexity, simplicity wins. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3963
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:49:34 -0700
parents 43b3b761d9d1
children a819b5777727
line wrap: on
line source

Test EOL update

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [diff]
  > git = 1
  > EOF

  $ seteol () {
  >     if [ $1 = "LF" ]; then
  >         EOL='\n'
  >     else
  >         EOL='\r\n'
  >     fi
  > }

  $ makerepo () {
  >     echo
  >     echo "# ==== setup repository ===="
  >     echo '% hg init'
  >     hg init repo
  >     cd repo
  > 
  >     cat > .hgeol <<EOF
  > [patterns]
  > **.txt = LF
  > EOF
  > 
  >     printf "first\nsecond\nthird\n" > a.txt
  >     hg commit --addremove -m 'LF commit'
  > 
  >     cat > .hgeol <<EOF
  > [patterns]
  > **.txt = CRLF
  > EOF
  > 
  >     printf "first\r\nsecond\r\nthird\r\n" > a.txt
  >     hg commit -m 'CRLF commit'
  > 
  >     cd ..
  > }

  $ dotest () {
  >     seteol $1
  > 
  >     echo
  >     echo "% hg clone repo repo-$1"
  >     hg clone --noupdate repo repo-$1
  >     cd repo-$1
  > 
  >     cat > .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > eol =
  > EOF
  > 
  >     hg update
  > 
  >     echo '% a.txt (before)'
  >     cat a.txt
  > 
  >     printf "first${EOL}third${EOL}" > a.txt
  > 
  >     echo '% a.txt (after)'
  >     cat a.txt
  >     echo '% hg diff'
  >     hg diff
  > 
  >     echo '% hg update 0'
  >     hg update 0
  > 
  >     echo '% a.txt'
  >     cat a.txt
  >     echo '% hg diff'
  >     hg diff
  > 
  > 
  >     cd ..
  >     rm -r repo-$1
  > }

  $ makerepo
  
  # ==== setup repository ====
  % hg init
  adding .hgeol
  adding a.txt
  $ dotest LF
  
  % hg clone repo repo-LF
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  % a.txt (before)
  first\r (esc)
  second\r (esc)
  third\r (esc)
  % a.txt (after)
  first
  third
  % hg diff
  diff --git a/a.txt b/a.txt
  --- a/a.txt
  +++ b/a.txt
  @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
   first\r (esc)
  -second\r (esc)
   third\r (esc)
  % hg update 0
  merging a.txt
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  % a.txt
  first
  third
  % hg diff
  diff --git a/a.txt b/a.txt
  --- a/a.txt
  +++ b/a.txt
  @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
   first
  -second
   third
  $ dotest CRLF
  
  % hg clone repo repo-CRLF
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  % a.txt (before)
  first\r (esc)
  second\r (esc)
  third\r (esc)
  % a.txt (after)
  first\r (esc)
  third\r (esc)
  % hg diff
  diff --git a/a.txt b/a.txt
  --- a/a.txt
  +++ b/a.txt
  @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
   first\r (esc)
  -second\r (esc)
   third\r (esc)
  % hg update 0
  merging a.txt
  1 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  % a.txt
  first
  third
  % hg diff
  diff --git a/a.txt b/a.txt
  --- a/a.txt
  +++ b/a.txt
  @@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
   first
  -second
   third
  $ rm -r repo