view tests/test-exchange-obsmarkers-case-B3.t @ 38732:be4984261611

merge: mark file gets as not thread safe (issue5933) In default installs, this has the effect of disabling the thread-based worker on Windows when manifesting files in the working directory. My measurements have shown that with revlog-based repositories, Mercurial spends a lot of CPU time in revlog code resolving file data. This ends up incurring a lot of context switching across threads and slows down `hg update` operations when going from an empty working directory to the tip of the repo. On mozilla-unified (246,351 files) on an i7-6700K (4+4 CPUs): before: 487s wall after: 360s wall (equivalent to worker.enabled=false) cpus=2: 379s wall Even with only 2 threads, the thread pool is still slower. The introduction of the thread-based worker (02b36e860e0b) states that it resulted in a "~50%" speedup for `hg sparse --enable-profile` and `hg sparse --disable-profile`. This disagrees with my measurement above. I theorize a few reasons for this: 1) Removal of files from the working directory is I/O - not CPU - bound and should benefit from a thread pool (unless I/O is insanely fast and the GIL release is near instantaneous). So tests like `hg sparse --enable-profile` may exercise deletion throughput and aren't good benchmarks for worker tasks that are CPU heavy. 2) The patch was authored by someone at Facebook. The results were likely measured against a repository using remotefilelog. And I believe that revision retrieval during working directory updates with remotefilelog will often use a remote store, thus being I/O and not CPU bound. This probably resulted in an overstated performance gain. Since there appears to be a need to enable the thread-based worker with some stores, I've made the flagging of file gets as thread safe configurable. I've made it experimental because I don't want to formalize a boolean flag for this option and because this attribute is best captured against the store implementation. But we don't have a proper store API for this yet. I'd rather cross this bridge later. It is possible there are revlog-based repositories that do benefit from a thread-based worker. I didn't do very comprehensive testing. If there are, we may want to devise a more proper algorithm for whether to use the thread-based worker, including possibly config options to limit the number of threads to use. But until I see evidence that justifies complexity, simplicity wins. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3963
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:49:34 -0700
parents eb586ed5d8ce
children 89630d0b3e23
line wrap: on
line source

============================================
Testing obsolescence markers push: Cases B.3
============================================

Mercurial pushes obsolescences markers relevant to the "pushed-set", the set of
all changesets that requested to be "in sync" after the push (even if they are
already on both side).

This test belongs to a series of tests checking such set is properly computed
and applied. This does not tests "obsmarkers" discovery capabilities.

Category B: pruning case
TestCase 3: Pruned changeset on non-pushed part of the history

B.3 Pruned changeset on non-pushed part of the history
======================================================

.. {{{
..   ⊗ C
..   |
..   ○ B
..   | ◔ A
..   |/
..   ● O
.. }}}
..
.. Marker exists from:
..
..  * C (prune)
..
.. Commands run:
..
..  * hg push -r A
..
.. Expected exchange:
..
..  * ø
..
.. Expected exclude:
..
..  * chain from B

Setup
-----

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/exchange-obsmarker-util.sh

initial

  $ setuprepos B.3
  creating test repo for test case B.3
  - pulldest
  - main
  - pushdest
  cd into `main` and proceed with env setup
  $ cd main
  $ mkcommit A
  $ hg up --quiet 0
  $ mkcommit B
  created new head
  $ mkcommit C
  $ hg prune -qd '0 0' .
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  x  e56289ab6378 (draft): C
  |
  @  35b183996678 (draft): B
  |
  | o  f5bc6836db60 (draft): A
  |/
  o  a9bdc8b26820 (public): O
  
  $ inspect_obsmarkers
  obsstore content
  ================
  e56289ab6378dc752fd7965f8bf66b58bda740bd 0 {35b1839966785d5703a01607229eea932db42f87} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'user': 'test'}
  $ cd ..
  $ cd ..

Actual Test
-----------------------------------

  $ dotest B.3 A
  ## Running testcase B.3
  # testing echange of "A" (f5bc6836db60)
  ## initial state
  # obstore: main
  e56289ab6378dc752fd7965f8bf66b58bda740bd 0 {35b1839966785d5703a01607229eea932db42f87} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest
  ## pushing "A" from main to pushdest
  pushing to pushdest
  searching for changes
  remote: adding changesets
  remote: adding manifests
  remote: adding file changes
  remote: added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  ## post push state
  # obstore: main
  e56289ab6378dc752fd7965f8bf66b58bda740bd 0 {35b1839966785d5703a01607229eea932db42f87} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest
  ## pulling "f5bc6836db60" from main into pulldest
  pulling from main
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets f5bc6836db60
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
  ## post pull state
  # obstore: main
  e56289ab6378dc752fd7965f8bf66b58bda740bd 0 {35b1839966785d5703a01607229eea932db42f87} (Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000) {'user': 'test'}
  # obstore: pushdest
  # obstore: pulldest