Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-log-exthook.t @ 38732:be4984261611
merge: mark file gets as not thread safe (issue5933)
In default installs, this has the effect of disabling the thread-based
worker on Windows when manifesting files in the working directory. My
measurements have shown that with revlog-based repositories, Mercurial
spends a lot of CPU time in revlog code resolving file data. This ends
up incurring a lot of context switching across threads and slows down
`hg update` operations when going from an empty working directory to
the tip of the repo.
On mozilla-unified (246,351 files) on an i7-6700K (4+4 CPUs):
before: 487s wall
after: 360s wall (equivalent to worker.enabled=false)
cpus=2: 379s wall
Even with only 2 threads, the thread pool is still slower.
The introduction of the thread-based worker (02b36e860e0b) states that
it resulted in a "~50%" speedup for `hg sparse --enable-profile` and
`hg sparse --disable-profile`. This disagrees with my measurement
above. I theorize a few reasons for this:
1) Removal of files from the working directory is I/O - not CPU - bound
and should benefit from a thread pool (unless I/O is insanely fast
and the GIL release is near instantaneous). So tests like `hg sparse
--enable-profile` may exercise deletion throughput and aren't good
benchmarks for worker tasks that are CPU heavy.
2) The patch was authored by someone at Facebook. The results were
likely measured against a repository using remotefilelog. And I
believe that revision retrieval during working directory updates with
remotefilelog will often use a remote store, thus being I/O and not
CPU bound. This probably resulted in an overstated performance gain.
Since there appears to be a need to enable the thread-based worker with
some stores, I've made the flagging of file gets as thread safe
configurable. I've made it experimental because I don't want to formalize
a boolean flag for this option and because this attribute is best
captured against the store implementation. But we don't have a proper
store API for this yet. I'd rather cross this bridge later.
It is possible there are revlog-based repositories that do benefit from
a thread-based worker. I didn't do very comprehensive testing. If there
are, we may want to devise a more proper algorithm for whether to use
the thread-based worker, including possibly config options to limit the
number of threads to use. But until I see evidence that justifies
complexity, simplicity wins.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3963
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:49:34 -0700 |
parents | c8e2d6ed1f9e |
children | 2b9f315a4217 |
line wrap: on
line source
Test hg log changeset printer external hook ------------------------------------------- $ cat > $TESTTMP/logexthook.py <<EOF > from __future__ import absolute_import > from mercurial import ( > commands, > logcmdutil, > repair, > ) > def rot13description(self, ctx): > summary = "summary".encode('rot13') > description = ctx.description().strip().splitlines()[0].encode('rot13') > self.ui.write("%s: %s\n" % (summary, description)) > def reposetup(ui, repo): > logcmdutil.changesetprinter._exthook = rot13description > EOF Prepare the repository $ hg init empty $ cd empty $ touch ROOT $ hg commit -A -m "Root" ROOT $ touch a b c $ hg commit -A -m "Add A, B, C" a b c Check the log $ hg log --config extensions.t=$TESTTMP/logexthook.py changeset: 1:70fc82b23320 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 fhzznel: Nqq N, O, P summary: Add A, B, C changeset: 0:b00443a54871 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 fhzznel: Ebbg summary: Root Check that exthook is working with graph log too $ hg log -G --config extensions.t=$TESTTMP/logexthook.py @ changeset: 1:70fc82b23320 | tag: tip | user: test | date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 | fhzznel: Nqq N, O, P | summary: Add A, B, C | o changeset: 0:b00443a54871 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 fhzznel: Ebbg summary: Root