view tests/test-merge-closedheads.t @ 38732:be4984261611

merge: mark file gets as not thread safe (issue5933)

In default installs, this has the effect of disabling the thread-based
worker on Windows when manifesting files in the working directory. My
measurements have shown that with revlog-based repositories, Mercurial
spends a lot of CPU time in revlog code resolving file data. This ends
up incurring a lot of context switching across threads and slows down
`hg update` operations when going from an empty working directory to
the tip of the repo.

On mozilla-unified (246,351 files) on an i7-6700K (4+4 CPUs):

before: 487s wall
after:  360s wall (equivalent to worker.enabled=false)
cpus=2: 379s wall

Even with only 2 threads, the thread pool is still slower.

The introduction of the thread-based worker (02b36e860e0b) states that
it resulted in a "~50%" speedup for `hg sparse --enable-profile` and
`hg sparse --disable-profile`. This disagrees with my measurement
above. I theorize a few reasons for this:

1) Removal of files from the working directory is I/O - not CPU - bound
   and should benefit from a thread pool (unless I/O is insanely fast
   and the GIL release is near instantaneous). So tests like `hg sparse
   --enable-profile` may exercise deletion throughput and aren't good
   benchmarks for worker tasks that are CPU heavy.
2) The patch was authored by someone at Facebook. The results were
   likely measured against a repository using remotefilelog. And I
   believe that revision retrieval during working directory updates with
   remotefilelog will often use a remote store, thus being I/O and not
   CPU bound. This probably resulted in an overstated performance gain.

Since there appears to be a need to enable the thread-based worker with
some stores, I've made the flagging of file gets as thread safe
configurable. I've made it experimental because I don't want to formalize
a boolean flag for this option and because this attribute is best
captured against the store implementation. But we don't have a proper
store API for this yet. I'd rather cross this bridge later.

It is possible there are revlog-based repositories that do benefit from
a thread-based worker. I didn't do very comprehensive testing. If there
are, we may want to devise a more proper algorithm for whether to use
the thread-based worker, including possibly config options to limit the
number of threads to use. But until I see evidence that justifies
complexity, simplicity wins.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3963

  $ hgcommit() {
  >    hg commit -u user "$@"
  > }

  $ hg init clhead
  $ cd clhead

  $ touch foo && hg add && hgcommit -m 'foo'
  adding foo
  $ touch bar && hg add && hgcommit -m 'bar'
  adding bar
  $ touch baz && hg add && hgcommit -m 'baz'
  adding baz

  $ echo "flub" > foo
  $ hgcommit -m "flub"
  $ echo "nub" > foo
  $ hgcommit -m "nub"

  $ hg up -C 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo "c1" > c1
  $ hg add c1
  $ hgcommit -m "c1"
  created new head
  $ echo "c2" > c1
  $ hgcommit -m "c2"

  $ hg up -C 2
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo "d1" > d1
  $ hg add d1
  $ hgcommit -m "d1"
  created new head
  $ echo "d2" > d1
  $ hgcommit -m "d2"
  $ hg tag -l good

fail with three heads
  $ hg up -C good
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge
  abort: branch 'default' has 3 heads - please merge with an explicit rev
  (run 'hg heads .' to see heads)
  [255]

close one of the heads
  $ hg up -C 6
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hgcommit -m 'close this head' --close-branch

succeed with two open heads
  $ hg up -C good
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg up -C good
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hgcommit -m 'merged heads'

hg update -C 8
  $ hg update -C 8
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

hg branch some-branch
  $ hg branch some-branch
  marked working directory as branch some-branch
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
hg commit
  $ hgcommit -m 'started some-branch'
hg commit --close-branch
  $ hgcommit --close-branch -m 'closed some-branch'

hg update default
  $ hg update default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
hg merge some-branch
  $ hg merge some-branch
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
hg commit (no reopening of some-branch)
  $ hgcommit -m 'merge with closed branch'

  $ cd ..