view tests/test-narrow-merge.t @ 38732:be4984261611

merge: mark file gets as not thread safe (issue5933)

In default installs, this has the effect of disabling the thread-based
worker on Windows when manifesting files in the working directory. My
measurements have shown that with revlog-based repositories, Mercurial
spends a lot of CPU time in revlog code resolving file data. This ends
up incurring a lot of context switching across threads and slows down
`hg update` operations when going from an empty working directory to
the tip of the repo.

On mozilla-unified (246,351 files) on an i7-6700K (4+4 CPUs):

before: 487s wall
after:  360s wall (equivalent to worker.enabled=false)
cpus=2: 379s wall

Even with only 2 threads, the thread pool is still slower.

The introduction of the thread-based worker (02b36e860e0b) states that
it resulted in a "~50%" speedup for `hg sparse --enable-profile` and
`hg sparse --disable-profile`. This disagrees with my measurement
above. I theorize a few reasons for this:

1) Removal of files from the working directory is I/O - not CPU - bound
   and should benefit from a thread pool (unless I/O is insanely fast
   and the GIL release is near instantaneous). So tests like `hg sparse
   --enable-profile` may exercise deletion throughput and aren't good
   benchmarks for worker tasks that are CPU heavy.
2) The patch was authored by someone at Facebook. The results were
   likely measured against a repository using remotefilelog. And I
   believe that revision retrieval during working directory updates with
   remotefilelog will often use a remote store, thus being I/O and not
   CPU bound. This probably resulted in an overstated performance gain.

Since there appears to be a need to enable the thread-based worker with
some stores, I've made the flagging of file gets as thread safe
configurable. I've made it experimental because I don't want to formalize
a boolean flag for this option and because this attribute is best
captured against the store implementation. But we don't have a proper
store API for this yet. I'd rather cross this bridge later.

It is possible there are revlog-based repositories that do benefit from
a thread-based worker. I didn't do very comprehensive testing. If there
are, we may want to devise a more proper algorithm for whether to use
the thread-based worker, including possibly config options to limit the
number of threads to use. But until I see evidence that justifies
complexity, simplicity wins.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3963

#testcases flat tree

  $ . "$TESTDIR/narrow-library.sh"

#if tree
  $ cat << EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [experimental]
  > treemanifest = 1
  > EOF
#endif

create full repo

  $ hg init master
  $ cd master
  $ cat >> .hg/hgrc <<EOF
  > [narrow]
  > serveellipses=True
  > EOF

  $ mkdir inside
  $ echo inside1 > inside/f1
  $ echo inside2 > inside/f2
  $ mkdir outside
  $ echo outside1 > outside/f1
  $ echo outside2 > outside/f2
  $ hg ci -Aqm 'initial'

  $ echo modified > inside/f1
  $ hg ci -qm 'modify inside/f1'

  $ hg update -q 0
  $ echo modified > inside/f2
  $ hg ci -qm 'modify inside/f2'

  $ hg update -q 0
  $ echo modified2 > inside/f1
  $ hg ci -qm 'conflicting inside/f1'

  $ hg update -q 0
  $ echo modified > outside/f1
  $ hg ci -qm 'modify outside/f1'

  $ hg update -q 0
  $ echo modified2 > outside/f1
  $ hg ci -qm 'conflicting outside/f1'

  $ cd ..

  $ hg clone --narrow ssh://user@dummy/master narrow --include inside
  requesting all changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 6 changesets with 5 changes to 2 files (+4 heads)
  new changesets *:* (glob)
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd narrow

  $ hg update -q 0

Can merge in when no files outside narrow spec are involved

  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify inside/f1")'
  $ hg merge 'desc("modify inside/f2")'
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg commit -m 'merge inside changes'

Can merge conflicting changes inside narrow spec

  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify inside/f1")'
  $ hg merge 'desc("conflicting inside/f1")' 2>&1 | egrep -v '(warning:|incomplete!)'
  merging inside/f1
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges or 'hg merge --abort' to abandon
  $ echo modified3 > inside/f1
  $ hg resolve -m
  (no more unresolved files)
  $ hg commit -m 'merge inside/f1'

TODO: Can merge non-conflicting changes outside narrow spec

  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify inside/f1")'
  $ hg merge 'desc("modify outside/f1")'
  abort: merge affects file 'outside/f1' outside narrow, which is not yet supported (flat !)
  abort: merge affects file 'outside/' outside narrow, which is not yet supported (tree !)
  (merging in the other direction may work)
  [255]

  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify outside/f1")'
  $ hg merge 'desc("modify inside/f1")'
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m 'merge from inside to outside'

Refuses merge of conflicting outside changes

  $ hg update -q 'desc("modify outside/f1")'
  $ hg merge 'desc("conflicting outside/f1")'
  abort: conflict in file 'outside/f1' is outside narrow clone (flat !)
  abort: conflict in file 'outside/' is outside narrow clone (tree !)
  [255]