view tests/test-propertycache.py @ 38732:be4984261611

merge: mark file gets as not thread safe (issue5933) In default installs, this has the effect of disabling the thread-based worker on Windows when manifesting files in the working directory. My measurements have shown that with revlog-based repositories, Mercurial spends a lot of CPU time in revlog code resolving file data. This ends up incurring a lot of context switching across threads and slows down `hg update` operations when going from an empty working directory to the tip of the repo. On mozilla-unified (246,351 files) on an i7-6700K (4+4 CPUs): before: 487s wall after: 360s wall (equivalent to worker.enabled=false) cpus=2: 379s wall Even with only 2 threads, the thread pool is still slower. The introduction of the thread-based worker (02b36e860e0b) states that it resulted in a "~50%" speedup for `hg sparse --enable-profile` and `hg sparse --disable-profile`. This disagrees with my measurement above. I theorize a few reasons for this: 1) Removal of files from the working directory is I/O - not CPU - bound and should benefit from a thread pool (unless I/O is insanely fast and the GIL release is near instantaneous). So tests like `hg sparse --enable-profile` may exercise deletion throughput and aren't good benchmarks for worker tasks that are CPU heavy. 2) The patch was authored by someone at Facebook. The results were likely measured against a repository using remotefilelog. And I believe that revision retrieval during working directory updates with remotefilelog will often use a remote store, thus being I/O and not CPU bound. This probably resulted in an overstated performance gain. Since there appears to be a need to enable the thread-based worker with some stores, I've made the flagging of file gets as thread safe configurable. I've made it experimental because I don't want to formalize a boolean flag for this option and because this attribute is best captured against the store implementation. But we don't have a proper store API for this yet. I'd rather cross this bridge later. It is possible there are revlog-based repositories that do benefit from a thread-based worker. I didn't do very comprehensive testing. If there are, we may want to devise a more proper algorithm for whether to use the thread-based worker, including possibly config options to limit the number of threads to use. But until I see evidence that justifies complexity, simplicity wins. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3963
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Wed, 18 Jul 2018 09:49:34 -0700
parents d83ca854fa21
children d33611280add
line wrap: on
line source

"""test behavior of propertycache and unfiltered propertycache

The repoview overlay is quite complex. We test the behavior of
property cache of both localrepo and repoview to prevent
regression."""

from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function
import os
import subprocess

from mercurial import (
    hg,
    localrepo,
    ui as uimod,
    util,
)

# create some special property cache that trace they call

calllog = []
@util.propertycache
def testcachedfoobar(repo):
    name = repo.filtername
    if name is None:
        name = ''
    val = len(name)
    calllog.append(val)
    return val

unficalllog = []
@localrepo.unfilteredpropertycache
def testcachedunfifoobar(repo):
    name = repo.filtername
    if name is None:
        name = ''
    val = 100 + len(name)
    unficalllog.append(val)
    return val

#plug them on repo
localrepo.localrepository.testcachedfoobar = testcachedfoobar
localrepo.localrepository.testcachedunfifoobar = testcachedunfifoobar


# Create an empty repo and instantiate it. It is important to run
# these tests on the real object to detect regression.
repopath = os.path.join(os.environ['TESTTMP'], 'repo')
assert subprocess.call(['hg', 'init', repopath]) == 0
ui = uimod.ui.load()
repo = hg.repository(ui, path=repopath).unfiltered()


print('')
print('=== property cache ===')
print('')
print('calllog:', calllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= first access on unfiltered, should do a call')
print('access:', repo.testcachedfoobar)
print('calllog:', calllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= second access on unfiltered, should not do call')
print('access', repo.testcachedfoobar)
print('calllog:', calllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= first access on "visible" view, should do a call')
visibleview = repo.filtered('visible')
print('cached value ("visible" view):',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('access:', visibleview.testcachedfoobar)
print('calllog:', calllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= second access on "visible view", should not do call')
print('access:', visibleview.testcachedfoobar)
print('calllog:', calllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= no effect on other view')
immutableview = repo.filtered('immutable')
print('cached value ("immutable" view):',
    vars(immutableview).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('access:', immutableview.testcachedfoobar)
print('calllog:', calllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("immutable" view):',
    vars(immutableview).get('testcachedfoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

# unfiltered property cache test
print('')
print('')
print('=== unfiltered property cache ===')
print('')
print('unficalllog:', unficalllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):      ',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):  ',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("immutable" view):',
    vars(immutableview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= first access on unfiltered, should do a call')
print('access (unfiltered):', repo.testcachedunfifoobar)
print('unficalllog:', unficalllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):      ',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= second access on unfiltered, should not do call')
print('access (unfiltered):', repo.testcachedunfifoobar)
print('unficalllog:', unficalllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):      ',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= access on view should use the unfiltered cache')
print('access (unfiltered):      ', repo.testcachedunfifoobar)
print('access ("visible" view):  ', visibleview.testcachedunfifoobar)
print('access ("immutable" view):', immutableview.testcachedunfifoobar)
print('unficalllog:', unficalllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):      ',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):  ',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("immutable" view):',
    vars(immutableview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))

print('')
print('= even if we clear the unfiltered cache')
del repo.__dict__['testcachedunfifoobar']
print('cached value (unfiltered):      ',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):  ',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("immutable" view):',
    vars(immutableview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('unficalllog:', unficalllog)
print('access ("visible" view):  ', visibleview.testcachedunfifoobar)
print('unficalllog:', unficalllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):      ',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):  ',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("immutable" view):',
    vars(immutableview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('access ("immutable" view):', immutableview.testcachedunfifoobar)
print('unficalllog:', unficalllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):      ',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):  ',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("immutable" view):',
    vars(immutableview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('access (unfiltered):      ', repo.testcachedunfifoobar)
print('unficalllog:', unficalllog)
print('cached value (unfiltered):      ',
    vars(repo).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("visible" view):  ',
    vars(visibleview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))
print('cached value ("immutable" view):',
    vars(immutableview).get('testcachedunfifoobar', 'NOCACHE'))