view tests/test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t @ 29196:bf7b8157c483 stable

strip: invalidate phase cache after stripping changeset (issue5235) When we remove a changeset from the changelog, the phase cache must be invalidated, otherwise it could refer to changesets that are no longer in the repo. To reproduce the failure, I created an extension querying the phase cache after the strip transaction is over. To do that, I stripped two commits with a bookmark on one of them to force another transaction (we open a transaction for moving bookmarks) after the strip transaction. Without the fix in this patch, the test leads to a stacktrace showing the issue: repair.strip(ui, repo, revs, backup) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/repair.py", line 205, in strip tr.close() File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 44, in _active return func(self, *args, **kwds) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 490, in close self._postclosecallback[cat](self) File "$TESTTMP/crashstrip2.py", line 4, in test [repo.changelog.node(r) for r in repo.revs("not public()")] File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/changelog.py", line 337, in node return super(changelog, self).node(rev) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/revlog.py", line 377, in node return self.index[rev][7] IndexError: revlog index out of range The situation was encountered in inhibit (evolve's repo) where we would crash following the volatile set invalidation submitted by Augie in e6f490e328635312ee214a12bc7fd3c7d46bf9ce. Before his patch the issue was masked as we were not accessing the phasecache after stripping a revision. This bug uncovered another but in histedit (see explanation in issue5235). I changed the histedit test accordingly to avoid fixing two things at once.
author Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com>
date Thu, 12 May 2016 06:13:59 -0700
parents aa9385f983fa
children eb586ed5d8ce
line wrap: on
line source

this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for
changesets, so first we have to recreate it

o  8
|
| o  7
| |
| o  6
|/|
o |  5
| |
o |  4
| |
| o  3
| |
| o  2
|/
o  1
|
o  0

  $ mkrev()
  > {
  >     revno=$1
  >     echo "rev $revno"
  >     echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt
  >     hg -q ci -m"rev $revno"
  > }

setup test repo1

  $ hg init repo1
  $ cd repo1
  $ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt
  $ hg ci -Am"rev 0"
  adding foo.txt
  $ mkrev 1
  rev 1

first branch

  $ mkrev 2
  rev 2
  $ mkrev 3
  rev 3

back to rev 1 to create second branch

  $ hg up -r1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkrev 4
  rev 4
  $ mkrev 5
  rev 5

merge first branch to second branch

  $ hg up -C -r5
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge
  0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt
  $ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch"

one more commit following the merge

  $ mkrev 7
  rev 7

back to "second branch" to make another head

  $ hg up -r5
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkrev 8
  rev 8

the story so far

  $ hg log -G --template "{rev}\n"
  @  8
  |
  | o  7
  | |
  | o  6
  |/|
  o |  5
  | |
  o |  4
  | |
  | o  3
  | |
  | o  2
  |/
  o  1
  |
  o  0
  

check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing

sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8

  $ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8

  $ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2
  comparing with ../repo2
  searching for changes
  4
  5
  6
  7
  8

test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions

this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it

actually bundles 7

  $ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2
  searching for changes
  5 changesets found

test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions

this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle

with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too

  $ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle
  5 changesets found

  $ cd ..