Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-bundle-vs-outgoing.t @ 29196:bf7b8157c483 stable
strip: invalidate phase cache after stripping changeset (issue5235)
When we remove a changeset from the changelog, the phase cache must be
invalidated, otherwise it could refer to changesets that are no longer in the
repo.
To reproduce the failure, I created an extension querying the phase cache after
the strip transaction is over.
To do that, I stripped two commits with a bookmark on one of them to force
another transaction (we open a transaction for moving bookmarks)
after the strip transaction.
Without the fix in this patch, the test leads to a stacktrace showing the issue:
repair.strip(ui, repo, revs, backup)
File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/repair.py", line 205, in strip
tr.close()
File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 44, in _active
return func(self, *args, **kwds)
File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 490, in close
self._postclosecallback[cat](self)
File "$TESTTMP/crashstrip2.py", line 4, in test
[repo.changelog.node(r) for r in repo.revs("not public()")]
File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/changelog.py", line 337, in node
return super(changelog, self).node(rev)
File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/revlog.py", line 377, in node
return self.index[rev][7]
IndexError: revlog index out of range
The situation was encountered in inhibit (evolve's repo) where we would crash
following the volatile set invalidation submitted by Augie in
e6f490e328635312ee214a12bc7fd3c7d46bf9ce. Before his patch the issue was masked
as we were not accessing the phasecache after stripping a revision.
This bug uncovered another but in histedit (see explanation in issue5235).
I changed the histedit test accordingly to avoid fixing two things at once.
author | Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 12 May 2016 06:13:59 -0700 |
parents | aa9385f983fa |
children | eb586ed5d8ce |
line wrap: on
line source
this structure seems to tickle a bug in bundle's search for changesets, so first we have to recreate it o 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 $ mkrev() > { > revno=$1 > echo "rev $revno" > echo "rev $revno" > foo.txt > hg -q ci -m"rev $revno" > } setup test repo1 $ hg init repo1 $ cd repo1 $ echo "rev 0" > foo.txt $ hg ci -Am"rev 0" adding foo.txt $ mkrev 1 rev 1 first branch $ mkrev 2 rev 2 $ mkrev 3 rev 3 back to rev 1 to create second branch $ hg up -r1 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 4 rev 4 $ mkrev 5 rev 5 merge first branch to second branch $ hg up -C -r5 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ HGMERGE=internal:local hg merge 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ echo "merge rev 5, rev 3" > foo.txt $ hg ci -m"merge first branch to second branch" one more commit following the merge $ mkrev 7 rev 7 back to "second branch" to make another head $ hg up -r5 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkrev 8 rev 8 the story so far $ hg log -G --template "{rev}\n" @ 8 | | o 7 | | | o 6 |/| o | 5 | | o | 4 | | | o 3 | | | o 2 |/ o 1 | o 0 check that "hg outgoing" really does the right thing sanity check of outgoing: expect revs 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg clone -r3 . ../repo2 adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 4 changesets with 4 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved this should (and does) report 5 outgoing revisions: 4 5 6 7 8 $ hg outgoing --template "{rev}\n" ../repo2 comparing with ../repo2 searching for changes 4 5 6 7 8 test bundle (destination repo): expect 5 revisions this should bundle the same 5 revisions that outgoing reported, but it actually bundles 7 $ hg bundle foo.bundle ../repo2 searching for changes 5 changesets found test bundle (base revision): expect 5 revisions this should (and does) give exactly the same result as bundle with a destination repo... i.e. it's wrong too $ hg bundle --base 3 foo.bundle 5 changesets found $ cd ..