view tests/test-changelog-exec.t @ 29196:bf7b8157c483 stable

strip: invalidate phase cache after stripping changeset (issue5235) When we remove a changeset from the changelog, the phase cache must be invalidated, otherwise it could refer to changesets that are no longer in the repo. To reproduce the failure, I created an extension querying the phase cache after the strip transaction is over. To do that, I stripped two commits with a bookmark on one of them to force another transaction (we open a transaction for moving bookmarks) after the strip transaction. Without the fix in this patch, the test leads to a stacktrace showing the issue: repair.strip(ui, repo, revs, backup) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/repair.py", line 205, in strip tr.close() File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 44, in _active return func(self, *args, **kwds) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 490, in close self._postclosecallback[cat](self) File "$TESTTMP/crashstrip2.py", line 4, in test [repo.changelog.node(r) for r in repo.revs("not public()")] File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/changelog.py", line 337, in node return super(changelog, self).node(rev) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/revlog.py", line 377, in node return self.index[rev][7] IndexError: revlog index out of range The situation was encountered in inhibit (evolve's repo) where we would crash following the volatile set invalidation submitted by Augie in e6f490e328635312ee214a12bc7fd3c7d46bf9ce. Before his patch the issue was masked as we were not accessing the phasecache after stripping a revision. This bug uncovered another but in histedit (see explanation in issue5235). I changed the histedit test accordingly to avoid fixing two things at once.
author Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com>
date Thu, 12 May 2016 06:13:59 -0700
parents e6e7ef68c879
children 009d0283de5f
line wrap: on
line source

#require execbit

b51a8138292a introduced a regression where we would mention in the
changelog executable files added by the second parent of a merge. Test
that that doesn't happen anymore

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

  $ echo bar > bar
  $ chmod +x bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'

manifest of p2:

  $ hg manifest
  bar
  foo

  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

manifest of p1:

  $ hg manifest
  foo

  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ chmod +x foo
  $ hg ci -m 'merge'

this should not mention bar but should mention foo:

  $ hg tip -v
  changeset:   3:c53d17ff3380
  tag:         tip
  parent:      2:ed1b79f46b9a
  parent:      1:d394a8db219b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       foo
  description:
  merge
  
  

  $ hg debugindex bar
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       5  .....       1 b004912a8510 000000000000 000000000000 (re)

  $ cd ..