view tests/test-issue522.t @ 29196:bf7b8157c483 stable

strip: invalidate phase cache after stripping changeset (issue5235)

When we remove a changeset from the changelog, the phase cache must be
invalidated, otherwise it could refer to changesets that are no longer in the
repo.

To reproduce the failure, I created an extension querying the phase cache after
the strip transaction is over.

To do that, I stripped two commits with a bookmark on one of them to force
another transaction (we open a transaction for moving bookmarks)
after the strip transaction.

Without the fix in this patch, the test leads to a stacktrace showing the issue:
      repair.strip(ui, repo, revs, backup)
    File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/repair.py", line 205, in strip
      tr.close()
    File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 44, in _active
      return func(self, *args, **kwds)
    File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 490, in close
      self._postclosecallback[cat](self)
    File "$TESTTMP/crashstrip2.py", line 4, in test
      [repo.changelog.node(r) for r in repo.revs("not public()")]
    File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/changelog.py", line 337, in node
      return super(changelog, self).node(rev)
    File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/revlog.py", line 377, in node
      return self.index[rev][7]
  IndexError: revlog index out of range

The situation was encountered in inhibit (evolve's repo) where we would crash
following the volatile set invalidation submitted by Augie in
e6f490e328635312ee214a12bc7fd3c7d46bf9ce. Before his patch the issue was masked
as we were not accessing the phasecache after stripping a revision.

This bug uncovered another but in histedit (see explanation in issue5235).
I changed the histedit test accordingly to avoid fixing two things at once.

https://bz.mercurial-scm.org/522

In the merge below, the file "foo" has the same contents in both
parents, but if we look at the file-level history, we'll notice that
the version in p1 is an ancestor of the version in p2. This test makes
sure that we'll use the version from p2 in the manifest of the merge
revision.

  $ hg init

  $ echo foo > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

  $ echo bar >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'

  $ hg backout -r tip -m 'backout changed foo'
  reverting foo
  changeset 2:4d9e78aaceee backs out changeset 1:b515023e500e

  $ hg up -C 0
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ touch bar
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar'

  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in local:
     bar
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: bbd179dfa0a7, local: 71766447bdbb+, remote: 4d9e78aaceee
   foo: remote is newer -> g
  getting foo
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg debugstate | grep foo
  m   0         -2 unset               foo

  $ hg st -A foo
  M foo

  $ hg ci -m 'merge'

  $ hg manifest --debug | grep foo
  c6fc755d7e68f49f880599da29f15add41f42f5a 644   foo

  $ hg debugindex foo
     rev    offset  length  ..... linkrev nodeid       p1           p2 (re)
       0         0       5  .....       0 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 000000000000 (re)
       1         5       9  .....       1 6f4310b00b9a 2ed2a3912a0b 000000000000 (re)
       2        14       5  .....       2 c6fc755d7e68 6f4310b00b9a 000000000000 (re)