view tests/test-patch.t @ 29196:bf7b8157c483 stable

strip: invalidate phase cache after stripping changeset (issue5235) When we remove a changeset from the changelog, the phase cache must be invalidated, otherwise it could refer to changesets that are no longer in the repo. To reproduce the failure, I created an extension querying the phase cache after the strip transaction is over. To do that, I stripped two commits with a bookmark on one of them to force another transaction (we open a transaction for moving bookmarks) after the strip transaction. Without the fix in this patch, the test leads to a stacktrace showing the issue: repair.strip(ui, repo, revs, backup) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/repair.py", line 205, in strip tr.close() File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 44, in _active return func(self, *args, **kwds) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/transaction.py", line 490, in close self._postclosecallback[cat](self) File "$TESTTMP/crashstrip2.py", line 4, in test [repo.changelog.node(r) for r in repo.revs("not public()")] File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/changelog.py", line 337, in node return super(changelog, self).node(rev) File "/Users/lcharignon/facebook-hg-rpms/hg-crew/mercurial/revlog.py", line 377, in node return self.index[rev][7] IndexError: revlog index out of range The situation was encountered in inhibit (evolve's repo) where we would crash following the volatile set invalidation submitted by Augie in e6f490e328635312ee214a12bc7fd3c7d46bf9ce. Before his patch the issue was masked as we were not accessing the phasecache after stripping a revision. This bug uncovered another but in histedit (see explanation in issue5235). I changed the histedit test accordingly to avoid fixing two things at once.
author Laurent Charignon <lcharignon@fb.com>
date Thu, 12 May 2016 06:13:59 -0700
parents 0705f2ac79d6
children 75be14993fda
line wrap: on
line source

  $ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF
  > import sys
  > print 'Using custom patch'
  > if '--binary' in sys.argv:
  >     print '--binary found !'
  > EOF

  $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "patch=python ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH

  $ hg init a
  $ cd a
  $ echo a > a
  $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0'
  adding a
  $ echo b >> a
  $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0'
  $ cd ..

This test checks that:
 - custom patch commands with arguments actually work
 - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like
 --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance
 --binary is added by default under win32.

check custom patch options are honored

  $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip
  $ hg clone -r 0 a b
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff
  applying ../a.diff
  Using custom patch
  applied to working directory

Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description

Prepare source repo and patch:

  $ rm $HGRCPATH
  $ hg init c
  $ cd c
  $ printf "a\rc" > a
  $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0'
  $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a
  $ cat << eof > log
  > first line which can't start with '# '
  > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  > # HG changeset patch
  > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  > eof
  $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0'
  $ hg export -o p 1
  $ cd ..

Clone and apply patch:

  $ hg clone -r 0 c d
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  updating to branch default
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd d
  $ hg import ../c/p
  applying ../c/p
  $ hg log -v -r 1
  changeset:   1:cd0bde79c428
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  files:       a
  description:
  first line which can't start with '# '
  # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem.
  A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3:
  # HG changeset patch
  # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment
  
  
  $ cd ..