Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-bookmarks-rebase.t @ 23301:c10dc5568069
context.status: wipe deleted/unknown/ignored fields when reversed
It makes no sense to request reverse status (i.e. changes from the
working copy to its parent) and then look at the deleted, unknown or
ignored fields. If you do, you would get the result from the forward
status (changes from parent to the working copy). Instead of giving a
nonsensical answer to a nonsensical question, it seems a little saner
to return empty lists. It might be best if we could prevent the caller
accessing these lists, but it's doubtful it's worth the trouble.
author | Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:19:07 -0800 |
parents | 23f785b38af3 |
children | 328afbad6e57 |
line wrap: on
line source
$ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "rebase=" >> $HGRCPATH initialize repository $ hg init $ echo 'a' > a $ hg ci -A -m "0" adding a $ echo 'b' > b $ hg ci -A -m "1" adding b $ hg up 0 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo 'c' > c $ hg ci -A -m "2" adding c created new head $ echo 'd' > d $ hg ci -A -m "3" adding d $ hg bookmark -r 1 one $ hg bookmark -r 3 two $ hg up -q two bookmark list $ hg bookmark one 1:925d80f479bb * two 3:2ae46b1d99a7 rebase $ hg rebase -s two -d one saved backup bundle to $TESTTMP/.hg/strip-backup/*-backup.hg (glob) $ hg log changeset: 3:42e5ed2cdcf4 bookmark: two tag: tip parent: 1:925d80f479bb user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: 3 changeset: 2:db815d6d32e6 parent: 0:f7b1eb17ad24 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: 2 changeset: 1:925d80f479bb bookmark: one user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: 1 changeset: 0:f7b1eb17ad24 user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 summary: 0