Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-changelog-exec.t @ 23301:c10dc5568069
context.status: wipe deleted/unknown/ignored fields when reversed
It makes no sense to request reverse status (i.e. changes from the
working copy to its parent) and then look at the deleted, unknown or
ignored fields. If you do, you would get the result from the forward
status (changes from parent to the working copy). Instead of giving a
nonsensical answer to a nonsensical question, it seems a little saner
to return empty lists. It might be best if we could prevent the caller
accessing these lists, but it's doubtful it's worth the trouble.
author | Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:19:07 -0800 |
parents | e6e7ef68c879 |
children | 009d0283de5f |
line wrap: on
line source
#require execbit b51a8138292a introduced a regression where we would mention in the changelog executable files added by the second parent of a merge. Test that that doesn't happen anymore $ hg init repo $ cd repo $ echo foo > foo $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo' $ echo bar > bar $ chmod +x bar $ hg ci -qAm 'add bar' manifest of p2: $ hg manifest bar foo $ hg up -qC 0 $ echo >> foo $ hg ci -m 'change foo' created new head manifest of p1: $ hg manifest foo $ hg merge 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ chmod +x foo $ hg ci -m 'merge' this should not mention bar but should mention foo: $ hg tip -v changeset: 3:c53d17ff3380 tag: tip parent: 2:ed1b79f46b9a parent: 1:d394a8db219b user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: foo description: merge $ hg debugindex bar rev offset length ..... linkrev nodeid p1 p2 (re) 0 0 5 ..... 1 b004912a8510 000000000000 000000000000 (re) $ cd ..