Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-confused-revert.t @ 23301:c10dc5568069
context.status: wipe deleted/unknown/ignored fields when reversed
It makes no sense to request reverse status (i.e. changes from the
working copy to its parent) and then look at the deleted, unknown or
ignored fields. If you do, you would get the result from the forward
status (changes from parent to the working copy). Instead of giving a
nonsensical answer to a nonsensical question, it seems a little saner
to return empty lists. It might be best if we could prevent the caller
accessing these lists, but it's doubtful it's worth the trouble.
author | Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> |
---|---|
date | Wed, 12 Nov 2014 21:19:07 -0800 |
parents | a934b9249574 |
children | fc1d75e7a98d |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init $ echo foo > a $ hg add a $ hg commit -m "1" $ echo bar > b $ hg add b $ hg remove a Should show a removed and b added: $ hg status A b R a $ hg revert --all undeleting a forgetting b Should show b unknown and a back to normal: $ hg status ? b $ rm b $ hg co -C 0 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo foo-a > a $ hg commit -m "2a" $ hg co -C 0 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo foo-b > a $ hg commit -m "2b" created new head $ HGMERGE=true hg merge 1 merging a 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) Should show foo-b: $ cat a foo-b $ echo bar > b $ hg add b $ rm a $ hg remove a Should show a removed and b added: $ hg status A b R a Revert should fail: $ hg revert abort: uncommitted merge with no revision specified (use "hg update" or see "hg help revert") [255] Revert should be ok now: $ hg revert -r2 --all undeleting a forgetting b Should show b unknown and a marked modified (merged): $ hg status M a ? b Should show foo-b: $ cat a foo-b