view tests/test-push-checkheads-pruned-B1.t @ 48247:c62e4397eb28

copy: recommend `--at-rev .` if target was added in parent commit

If the target file was added in the working copy parent, it's much
more likely that the user meant to use `--at-rev .` (to record the
copy/rename in the that commit) than `--force` (to replace the
just-added file by another file).

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D11667

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case B-1
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category B: simple case involving pruned changesets
TestCase 1: single pruned changeset

.. old-state:
..
.. * 1 changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * old branch is pruned
.. * 1 new unrelated branch
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..       ◔ B
..       |
..   A ⊗ |
..     |/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir B1
  $ cd B1
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd client
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit B0
  created new head
  $ hg debugobsolete --record-parents `getid "desc(A0)"`
  1 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  @  74ff5441d343 (draft): B0
  |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/B1/server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  1 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets

  $ cd ../..