view tests/test-double-merge.t @ 39356:c8e4eae84808

narrow: add server logic to send cg while widening without ellipsis Before this patch, if you try to widen a narrow clone without ellipsis enabled, it will be broken and the exchange.pull() done by tracked command to widen the clone will be no-op because no custom logic exists for this and server sees that we have all csets and it says `no changes found`. The widening with ellipsis send KILL for existing changegroups and send new changegroups because of the change in ellipsis hash, but we can prevent that in non-ellipsis cases. This patch adds server side logic to send the changegroups for the changesets which are on the client again with filelogs and manifests for the new includes. This is a very starting implementation and we send changegroups and manifests too while we can prevent them. Following things can definitely be improved in the logic this patch adds: 1) Send just the filelogs and treemanifests 2) Send the filelogs only for the additions in the include I tried 1) here but the code is coupled tightly and the way I was able to do that was hacking into the changegroup generation code in a very dirty way, like adding conditionals and preventing the yield. This patch also adds a 'widen' kwarg to prevent other commands except widening to go through that codepath. The test changes demonstrate that the new implementation is correct and fixes things. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4383
author Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru>
date Sun, 26 Aug 2018 20:20:34 +0300
parents 564a354f7f35
children 91a0bc50b288
line wrap: on
line source

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ echo line 1 > foo
  $ hg ci -qAm 'add foo'

copy foo to bar and change both files
  $ hg cp foo bar
  $ echo line 2-1 >> foo
  $ echo line 2-2 >> bar
  $ hg ci -m 'cp foo bar; change both'

in another branch, change foo in a way that doesn't conflict with
the other changes
  $ hg up -qC 0
  $ echo line 0 > foo
  $ hg cat foo >> foo
  $ hg ci -m 'change foo'
  created new head

we get conflicts that shouldn't be there
  $ hg merge -P
  changeset:   1:484bf6903104
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     cp foo bar; change both
  
  $ hg merge --debug
    searching for copies back to rev 1
    unmatched files in other:
     bar
    all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent, % = renamed and deleted):
     src: 'foo' -> dst: 'bar' *
    checking for directory renames
  resolving manifests
   branchmerge: True, force: False, partial: False
   ancestor: e6dc8efe11cc, local: 6a0df1dad128+, remote: 484bf6903104
   preserving foo for resolve of bar
   preserving foo for resolve of foo
  starting 4 threads for background file closing (?)
   bar: remote copied from foo -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for bar (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging foo and bar to bar
  my bar@6a0df1dad128+ other bar@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
   foo: versions differ -> m (premerge)
  picked tool ':merge' for foo (binary False symlink False changedelete False)
  merging foo
  my foo@6a0df1dad128+ other foo@484bf6903104 ancestor foo@e6dc8efe11cc
   premerge successful
  0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

contents of foo
  $ cat foo
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-1

contents of bar
  $ cat bar
  line 0
  line 1
  line 2-2

  $ cd ..