view doc/docchecker @ 40337:cb516a854bc7

narrow: only send the narrowspecs back if ACL in play

I am unable to think why we need to send narrowspecs back from the server. The
current state adds a 'narrow:spec' part to each changegroup which is generated
when narrow extension is enabled. So we are sending narrowspecs on pull also.

There is a problem with sending the narrowspecs the way we are doing it right
now. We add include and exclude as parameter of the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part.
The the len of include or exclude string increase 255 which is obvious while
working on large repos, bundle2 generation code breaks. For more on that refer
issue5952 on bugzilla.

I was thinking why we need to send the narrowspecs back, and deleted the
'narrow:spec' bundle2 part generation code and found that only narrow-acl test
has some failure.

With this patch, we will only send the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part if ACL is
enabled because the original narrowspecs in those cases can be a subset of
narrowspecs user requested.

There are phase related output change in couple of tests. The output change
shows that we are now dealing in public phases completely. So maybe sending the
narrow:spec bundle2 part was preventing phases being exchanged or phase bundle2
data being applied.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4931

#!/usr/bin/env python
#
# docchecker - look for problematic markup
#
# Copyright 2016 timeless <[e-mail]> and others
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function

import re
import sys

leadingline = re.compile(r'(^\s*)(\S.*)$')

checks = [
  (r""":hg:`[^`]*'[^`]*`""",
    """warning: please avoid nesting ' in :hg:`...`"""),
  (r'\w:hg:`',
    'warning: please have a space before :hg:'),
  (r"""(?:[^a-z][^'.])hg ([^,;"`]*'(?!hg)){2}""",
    '''warning: please use " instead of ' for hg ... "..."'''),
]

def check(line):
    messages = []
    for match, msg in checks:
        if re.search(match, line):
            messages.append(msg)
    if messages:
        print(line)
        for msg in messages:
            print(msg)

def work(file):
    (llead, lline) = ('', '')

    for line in file:
        # this section unwraps lines
        match = leadingline.match(line)
        if not match:
            check(lline)
            (llead, lline) = ('', '')
            continue

        lead, line = match.group(1), match.group(2)
        if (lead == llead):
            if (lline != ''):
                lline += ' ' + line
            else:
                lline = line
        else:
            check(lline)
            (llead, lline) = (lead, line)
    check(lline)

def main():
    for f in sys.argv[1:]:
        try:
            with open(f) as file:
                work(file)
        except BaseException as e:
            print("failed to process %s: %s" % (f, e))

main()