narrow: only send the narrowspecs back if ACL in play
I am unable to think why we need to send narrowspecs back from the server. The
current state adds a 'narrow:spec' part to each changegroup which is generated
when narrow extension is enabled. So we are sending narrowspecs on pull also.
There is a problem with sending the narrowspecs the way we are doing it right
now. We add include and exclude as parameter of the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part.
The the len of include or exclude string increase 255 which is obvious while
working on large repos, bundle2 generation code breaks. For more on that refer
issue5952 on bugzilla.
I was thinking why we need to send the narrowspecs back, and deleted the
'narrow:spec' bundle2 part generation code and found that only narrow-acl test
has some failure.
With this patch, we will only send the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part if ACL is
enabled because the original narrowspecs in those cases can be a subset of
narrowspecs user requested.
There are phase related output change in couple of tests. The output change
shows that we are now dealing in public phases completely. So maybe sending the
narrow:spec bundle2 part was preventing phases being exchanged or phase bundle2
data being applied.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4931
# discovery.py - protocol changeset discovery functions
#
# Copyright 2010 Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.
from __future__ import absolute_import
import collections
from .i18n import _
from .node import (
nullid,
short,
)
from . import (
error,
pycompat,
)
def findcommonincoming(repo, remote, heads=None, force=False):
"""Return a tuple (common, fetch, heads) used to identify the common
subset of nodes between repo and remote.
"common" is a list of (at least) the heads of the common subset.
"fetch" is a list of roots of the nodes that would be incoming, to be
supplied to changegroupsubset.
"heads" is either the supplied heads, or else the remote's heads.
"""
knownnode = repo.changelog.hasnode
search = []
fetch = set()
seen = set()
seenbranch = set()
base = set()
if not heads:
with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
heads = e.callcommand('heads', {}).result()
if repo.changelog.tip() == nullid:
base.add(nullid)
if heads != [nullid]:
return [nullid], [nullid], list(heads)
return [nullid], [], heads
# assume we're closer to the tip than the root
# and start by examining the heads
repo.ui.status(_("searching for changes\n"))
unknown = []
for h in heads:
if not knownnode(h):
unknown.append(h)
else:
base.add(h)
if not unknown:
return list(base), [], list(heads)
req = set(unknown)
reqcnt = 0
progress = repo.ui.makeprogress(_('searching'), unit=_('queries'))
# search through remote branches
# a 'branch' here is a linear segment of history, with four parts:
# head, root, first parent, second parent
# (a branch always has two parents (or none) by definition)
with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
branches = e.callcommand('branches', {'nodes': unknown}).result()
unknown = collections.deque(branches)
while unknown:
r = []
while unknown:
n = unknown.popleft()
if n[0] in seen:
continue
repo.ui.debug("examining %s:%s\n"
% (short(n[0]), short(n[1])))
if n[0] == nullid: # found the end of the branch
pass
elif n in seenbranch:
repo.ui.debug("branch already found\n")
continue
elif n[1] and knownnode(n[1]): # do we know the base?
repo.ui.debug("found incomplete branch %s:%s\n"
% (short(n[0]), short(n[1])))
search.append(n[0:2]) # schedule branch range for scanning
seenbranch.add(n)
else:
if n[1] not in seen and n[1] not in fetch:
if knownnode(n[2]) and knownnode(n[3]):
repo.ui.debug("found new changeset %s\n" %
short(n[1]))
fetch.add(n[1]) # earliest unknown
for p in n[2:4]:
if knownnode(p):
base.add(p) # latest known
for p in n[2:4]:
if p not in req and not knownnode(p):
r.append(p)
req.add(p)
seen.add(n[0])
if r:
reqcnt += 1
progress.increment()
repo.ui.debug("request %d: %s\n" %
(reqcnt, " ".join(map(short, r))))
for p in pycompat.xrange(0, len(r), 10):
with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
branches = e.callcommand('branches', {
'nodes': r[p:p + 10],
}).result()
for b in branches:
repo.ui.debug("received %s:%s\n" %
(short(b[0]), short(b[1])))
unknown.append(b)
# do binary search on the branches we found
while search:
newsearch = []
reqcnt += 1
progress.increment()
with remote.commandexecutor() as e:
between = e.callcommand('between', {'pairs': search}).result()
for n, l in zip(search, between):
l.append(n[1])
p = n[0]
f = 1
for i in l:
repo.ui.debug("narrowing %d:%d %s\n" % (f, len(l), short(i)))
if knownnode(i):
if f <= 2:
repo.ui.debug("found new branch changeset %s\n" %
short(p))
fetch.add(p)
base.add(i)
else:
repo.ui.debug("narrowed branch search to %s:%s\n"
% (short(p), short(i)))
newsearch.append((p, i))
break
p, f = i, f * 2
search = newsearch
# sanity check our fetch list
for f in fetch:
if knownnode(f):
raise error.RepoError(_("already have changeset ")
+ short(f[:4]))
base = list(base)
if base == [nullid]:
if force:
repo.ui.warn(_("warning: repository is unrelated\n"))
else:
raise error.Abort(_("repository is unrelated"))
repo.ui.debug("found new changesets starting at " +
" ".join([short(f) for f in fetch]) + "\n")
progress.complete()
repo.ui.debug("%d total queries\n" % reqcnt)
return base, list(fetch), heads