view tests/test-update-names.t @ 40337:cb516a854bc7

narrow: only send the narrowspecs back if ACL in play I am unable to think why we need to send narrowspecs back from the server. The current state adds a 'narrow:spec' part to each changegroup which is generated when narrow extension is enabled. So we are sending narrowspecs on pull also. There is a problem with sending the narrowspecs the way we are doing it right now. We add include and exclude as parameter of the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part. The the len of include or exclude string increase 255 which is obvious while working on large repos, bundle2 generation code breaks. For more on that refer issue5952 on bugzilla. I was thinking why we need to send the narrowspecs back, and deleted the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part generation code and found that only narrow-acl test has some failure. With this patch, we will only send the 'narrow:spec' bundle2 part if ACL is enabled because the original narrowspecs in those cases can be a subset of narrowspecs user requested. There are phase related output change in couple of tests. The output change shows that we are now dealing in public phases completely. So maybe sending the narrow:spec bundle2 part was preventing phases being exchanged or phase bundle2 data being applied. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4931
author Pulkit Goyal <pulkit@yandex-team.ru>
date Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:36:59 +0300
parents c8514f858788
children
line wrap: on
line source

Test update logic when there are renames or weird same-name cases between dirs
and files

Update with local changes across a file rename

  $ hg init r1 && cd r1

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg ci -m a

  $ hg mv a b
  $ hg ci -m rename

  $ echo b > b
  $ hg ci -m change

  $ hg up -q 0

  $ echo c > a

  $ hg up
  merging a and b to b
  warning: conflicts while merging b! (edit, then use 'hg resolve --mark')
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 1 files unresolved
  use 'hg resolve' to retry unresolved file merges
  [1]

Test update when local untracked directory exists with the same name as a
tracked file in a commit we are updating to
  $ hg init r2 && cd r2
  $ echo root > root && hg ci -Am root  # rev 0
  adding root
  $ echo text > name && hg ci -Am "name is a file"  # rev 1
  adding name
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkdir name
  $ hg up 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

Test update when local untracked directory exists with some files in it and has
the same name a tracked file in a commit we are updating to. In future this
should be updated to give an friendlier error message, but now we should just
make sure that this does not erase untracked data
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkdir name
  $ echo text > name/file
  $ hg st
  ? name/file
  $ hg up 1
  abort: Unlinking directory not permitted: *$TESTTMP/r1/r2/name* (glob) (windows !)
  abort: Directory not empty: '?\$TESTTMP/r1/r2/name'? (re) (no-windows !)
  [255]
  $ cat name/file
  text
  $ cd ..

#if symlink

Test update when two commits have symlinks that point to different folders
  $ hg init r3 && cd r3
  $ echo root > root && hg ci -Am root
  adding root
  $ mkdir folder1 && mkdir folder2
  $ ln -s folder1 folder
  $ hg ci -Am "symlink to folder1"
  adding folder
  $ rm folder
  $ ln -s folder2 folder
  $ hg ci -Am "symlink to folder2"
  $ hg up 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd ..

#endif

#if rmcwd

Test that warning is printed if cwd is deleted during update
  $ hg init r4 && cd r4
  $ mkdir dir
  $ cd dir
  $ echo a > a
  $ echo b > b
  $ hg add a b
  $ hg ci -m "file and dir"
  $ hg up -q null
  current directory was removed
  (consider changing to repo root: $TESTTMP/r1/r4)

#endif