view tests/test-hghave.t @ 47872:cdad6560e832

wireprotov1peer: simplify the way batchable rpcs are defined

The scheme with futures/generator is confusing due to the way
communication is done by side effects, especially with two different
"future" objects. Just returning a request and a function to read the
response is easier to understand.

There are tests failures with the largefiles extension due to it
aliasing one rpc to another one, which gets fixed in the next commit.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D11211

  $ . "$TESTDIR/helpers-testrepo.sh"

Testing that hghave does not crash when checking features

  $ hghave --test-features 2>/dev/null

Testing hghave extensibility for third party tools

  $ cat > hghaveaddon.py <<EOF
  > import hghave
  > @hghave.check("custom", "custom hghave feature")
  > def has_custom():
  >     return True
  > EOF

(invocation via run-tests.py)

  $ cat > test-hghaveaddon.t <<EOF
  > #require custom
  >   $ echo foo
  >   foo
  > EOF
  $ ( \
  > testrepohgenv; \
  > "$PYTHON" $TESTDIR/run-tests.py --with-hg=$HGTEST_REAL_HG -j 1 \
  >    $HGTEST_RUN_TESTS_PURE test-hghaveaddon.t \
  > )
  running 1 tests using 1 parallel processes 
  .
  # Ran 1 tests, 0 skipped, 0 failed.

(invocation via command line)

  $ unset TESTDIR
  $ hghave custom

(terminate with exit code 2 at failure of importing hghaveaddon.py)

  $ rm hghaveaddon.*
  $ cat > hghaveaddon.py <<NO_CHECK_EOF
  > importing this file should cause syntax error
  > NO_CHECK_EOF

  $ hghave custom
  failed to import hghaveaddon.py from '.': invalid syntax (hghaveaddon.py, line 1)
  [2]