view tests/test-push-checkheads-pruned-B6.t @ 51871:cfd30df0f8e4

bundlerepo: fix mismatches with repository and revlog classes Both pytype and PyCharm complained that `write()` and `_write()` in the bundlephasecache class aren't proper overrides- indeed they seem to be missing an argument that the base class has. PyCharm and pytype also complained that the `revlog.revlog` class doesn't have a `_chunk()` method. That looks like it was moved from revlog to `_InnerRevlog` back in e8ad6d8de8b8, and wasn't caught because this module wasn't type checked. However, I couldn't figure out a syntax with `revlog.revlog._inner._chunk(self, rev)`, as it complained about passing too many args. `bundlerevlog._rawtext()` uses this `super(...)` style to call the super class, so hopefully that works, even with the wonky dynamic subclassing. The revlog class needed the `_InnerRevlog` field typed because it isn't set in the constructor. Finally, the vfs type hints look broken. This initially failed with: File "/mnt/c/Users/Matt/hg/mercurial/bundlerepo.py", line 65, in __init__: Function readonlyvfs.__init__ was called with the wrong arguments [wrong-arg-types] Expected: (self, vfs: mercurial.vfs.vfs) Actually passed: (self, vfs: Callable) Called from (traceback): line 232, in dirlog line 214, in __init__ I don't see a raw Callable, but I tried changing some of the vfs args to be typed as `vfsmod.abstractvfs`, but that class doesn't have `options`, so it failed elsewhere. `readonlyvfs` isn't a subclass of `vfs` (it's a subclass of `abstractvfs`), so I'm not sure how to handle that. It would be a shame to have to make a union of vfs subclasses (but not all of them have `options` either).
author Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com>
date Sat, 03 Aug 2024 01:33:13 -0400
parents 34a46d48d24e
children
line wrap: on
line source

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case B-6
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category B: simple case involving pruned changesets
TestCase 6: single changesets, pruned then superseeded (on a new changeset)

.. old-state:
..
.. * 1 changeset branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * old branch is rewritten onto another one,
.. * the new version is then pruned.
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * push allowed
..
.. graph-summary:
..
..   A ø⇠⊗ A'
..     | |
..     | ◔ B
..     |/
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir B6
  $ cd B6
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd client
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit B0
  created new head
  $ mkcommit A1
  $ hg up 'desc(B0)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)"` `getid "desc(A1)"`
  1 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg debugobsolete --record-parents `getid "desc(A1)"`
  1 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  x  ba93660aff8d (draft): A1
  |
  @  74ff5441d343 (draft): B0
  |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/B6/server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads)
  2 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets

  $ cd ../..