Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-patch.t @ 36743:d031609b3cb7 stable
changegroup: do not delta lfs revisions
There is no way to distinguish whether a delta base is LFS or non-LFS.
If the delta is against LFS rawtext, and the client trying to apply it has
the base revision stored as fulltext, the delta (aka. bundle) will fail to
apply.
This patch forbids using delta for LFS revisions in changegroup so bad
deltas won't be transmitted.
Note: this does not solve the problem entirely. It solves LFS delta applying
to non-LFS base. But the other direction: non-LFS delta applying to LFS base
is not solved yet.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D2067
author | Jun Wu <quark@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Tue, 06 Feb 2018 19:08:25 -0800 |
parents | eb586ed5d8ce |
children | 90c5ca718781 |
line wrap: on
line source
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF > from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function > import sys > print('Using custom patch') > if '--binary' in sys.argv: > print('--binary found !') > EOF $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "patch=$PYTHON ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo a > a $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0' adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0' $ cd .. This test checks that: - custom patch commands with arguments actually work - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance --binary is added by default under win32. check custom patch options are honored $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip $ hg clone -r 0 a b adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets 8580ff50825a updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff applying ../a.diff Using custom patch applied to working directory Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description Prepare source repo and patch: $ rm $HGRCPATH $ hg init c $ cd c $ printf "a\rc" > a $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0' $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a $ cat << eof > log > first line which can't start with '# ' > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: > # HG changeset patch > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment > eof $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0' $ hg export -o p 1 $ cd .. Clone and apply patch: $ hg clone -r 0 c d adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets 7fadb901d403 updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd d $ hg import ../c/p applying ../c/p $ hg log -v -r 1 changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: a description: first line which can't start with '# ' # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: # HG changeset patch # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment $ cd ..