Mercurial > hg
view mercurial/hbisect.py @ 42522:d29db0a0c4eb
update: fix spurious unclean status bug shown by previous commit
The crux of the problem is:
- the dirstate is corrupted (the sizes/dates are assigned to the wrong files)
- because when worker.worker is used with a return value (batchget in
merge.py here), the return value when worker.worker effectively parallelizes
is permuted
- this is because worker.worker's partition of input and combination of output
values are not inverses of one another: it split [1,2,3,4,5,6] into
[[1,3,5],[2,4,6]], but combines that into [1,3,5,2,4,6].
Given that worker.worker doesn't call its function argument on contiguous
chunks on the input arguments, sticking with lists means we'd need to
know the relation between the inputs of worker.worker function argument
(for instance, requiring that every input element is mapped to exactly
one output element). It seems better to instead switch return values to
dicts, which can combined reliably with a straighforward restriction.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D6581
author | Valentin Gatien-Baron <valentin.gatienbaron@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 27 Jun 2019 11:39:35 +0200 |
parents | 21eda240be07 |
children | 2372284d9457 |
line wrap: on
line source
# changelog bisection for mercurial # # Copyright 2007 Matt Mackall # Copyright 2005, 2006 Benoit Boissinot <benoit.boissinot@ens-lyon.org> # # Inspired by git bisect, extension skeleton taken from mq.py. # # This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the # GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version. from __future__ import absolute_import import collections from .i18n import _ from .node import ( hex, short, ) from . import ( error, ) def bisect(repo, state): """find the next node (if any) for testing during a bisect search. returns a (nodes, number, good) tuple. 'nodes' is the final result of the bisect if 'number' is 0. Otherwise 'number' indicates the remaining possible candidates for the search and 'nodes' contains the next bisect target. 'good' is True if bisect is searching for a first good changeset, False if searching for a first bad one. """ repo = repo.unfiltered() changelog = repo.changelog clparents = changelog.parentrevs skip = {changelog.rev(n) for n in state['skip']} def buildancestors(bad, good): badrev = min([changelog.rev(n) for n in bad]) ancestors = collections.defaultdict(lambda: None) for rev in repo.revs("descendants(%ln) - ancestors(%ln)", good, good): ancestors[rev] = [] if ancestors[badrev] is None: return badrev, None return badrev, ancestors good = False badrev, ancestors = buildancestors(state['bad'], state['good']) if not ancestors: # looking for bad to good transition? good = True badrev, ancestors = buildancestors(state['good'], state['bad']) bad = changelog.node(badrev) if not ancestors: # now we're confused if (len(state['bad']) == 1 and len(state['good']) == 1 and state['bad'] != state['good']): raise error.Abort(_("starting revisions are not directly related")) raise error.Abort(_("inconsistent state, %d:%s is good and bad") % (badrev, short(bad))) # build children dict children = {} visit = collections.deque([badrev]) candidates = [] while visit: rev = visit.popleft() if ancestors[rev] == []: candidates.append(rev) for prev in clparents(rev): if prev != -1: if prev in children: children[prev].append(rev) else: children[prev] = [rev] visit.append(prev) candidates.sort() # have we narrowed it down to one entry? # or have all other possible candidates besides 'bad' have been skipped? tot = len(candidates) unskipped = [c for c in candidates if (c not in skip) and (c != badrev)] if tot == 1 or not unskipped: return ([changelog.node(c) for c in candidates], 0, good) perfect = tot // 2 # find the best node to test best_rev = None best_len = -1 poison = set() for rev in candidates: if rev in poison: # poison children poison.update(children.get(rev, [])) continue a = ancestors[rev] or [rev] ancestors[rev] = None x = len(a) # number of ancestors y = tot - x # number of non-ancestors value = min(x, y) # how good is this test? if value > best_len and rev not in skip: best_len = value best_rev = rev if value == perfect: # found a perfect candidate? quit early break if y < perfect and rev not in skip: # all downhill from here? # poison children poison.update(children.get(rev, [])) continue for c in children.get(rev, []): if ancestors[c]: ancestors[c] = list(set(ancestors[c] + a)) else: ancestors[c] = a + [c] assert best_rev is not None best_node = changelog.node(best_rev) return ([best_node], tot, good) def extendrange(repo, state, nodes, good): # bisect is incomplete when it ends on a merge node and # one of the parent was not checked. parents = repo[nodes[0]].parents() if len(parents) > 1: if good: side = state['bad'] else: side = state['good'] num = len(set(i.node() for i in parents) & set(side)) if num == 1: return parents[0].ancestor(parents[1]) return None def load_state(repo): state = {'current': [], 'good': [], 'bad': [], 'skip': []} for l in repo.vfs.tryreadlines("bisect.state"): kind, node = l[:-1].split() node = repo.unfiltered().lookup(node) if kind not in state: raise error.Abort(_("unknown bisect kind %s") % kind) state[kind].append(node) return state def save_state(repo, state): f = repo.vfs("bisect.state", "w", atomictemp=True) with repo.wlock(): for kind in sorted(state): for node in state[kind]: f.write("%s %s\n" % (kind, hex(node))) f.close() def resetstate(repo): """remove any bisect state from the repository""" if repo.vfs.exists("bisect.state"): repo.vfs.unlink("bisect.state") def checkstate(state): """check we have both 'good' and 'bad' to define a range Raise Abort exception otherwise.""" if state['good'] and state['bad']: return True if not state['good']: raise error.Abort(_('cannot bisect (no known good revisions)')) else: raise error.Abort(_('cannot bisect (no known bad revisions)')) def get(repo, status): """ Return a list of revision(s) that match the given status: - ``good``, ``bad``, ``skip``: csets explicitly marked as good/bad/skip - ``goods``, ``bads`` : csets topologically good/bad - ``range`` : csets taking part in the bisection - ``pruned`` : csets that are goods, bads or skipped - ``untested`` : csets whose fate is yet unknown - ``ignored`` : csets ignored due to DAG topology - ``current`` : the cset currently being bisected """ state = load_state(repo) if status in ('good', 'bad', 'skip', 'current'): return map(repo.unfiltered().changelog.rev, state[status]) else: # In the following sets, we do *not* call 'bisect()' with more # than one level of recursion, because that can be very, very # time consuming. Instead, we always develop the expression as # much as possible. # 'range' is all csets that make the bisection: # - have a good ancestor and a bad descendant, or conversely # that's because the bisection can go either way range = '( bisect(bad)::bisect(good) | bisect(good)::bisect(bad) )' _t = repo.revs('bisect(good)::bisect(bad)') # The sets of topologically good or bad csets if len(_t) == 0: # Goods are topologically after bads goods = 'bisect(good)::' # Pruned good csets bads = '::bisect(bad)' # Pruned bad csets else: # Goods are topologically before bads goods = '::bisect(good)' # Pruned good csets bads = 'bisect(bad)::' # Pruned bad csets # 'pruned' is all csets whose fate is already known: good, bad, skip skips = 'bisect(skip)' # Pruned skipped csets pruned = '( (%s) | (%s) | (%s) )' % (goods, bads, skips) # 'untested' is all cset that are- in 'range', but not in 'pruned' untested = '( (%s) - (%s) )' % (range, pruned) # 'ignored' is all csets that were not used during the bisection # due to DAG topology, but may however have had an impact. # E.g., a branch merged between bads and goods, but whose branch- # point is out-side of the range. iba = '::bisect(bad) - ::bisect(good)' # Ignored bads' ancestors iga = '::bisect(good) - ::bisect(bad)' # Ignored goods' ancestors ignored = '( ( (%s) | (%s) ) - (%s) )' % (iba, iga, range) if status == 'range': return repo.revs(range) elif status == 'pruned': return repo.revs(pruned) elif status == 'untested': return repo.revs(untested) elif status == 'ignored': return repo.revs(ignored) elif status == "goods": return repo.revs(goods) elif status == "bads": return repo.revs(bads) else: raise error.ParseError(_('invalid bisect state')) def label(repo, node): rev = repo.changelog.rev(node) # Try explicit sets if rev in get(repo, 'good'): # i18n: bisect changeset status return _('good') if rev in get(repo, 'bad'): # i18n: bisect changeset status return _('bad') if rev in get(repo, 'skip'): # i18n: bisect changeset status return _('skipped') if rev in get(repo, 'untested') or rev in get(repo, 'current'): # i18n: bisect changeset status return _('untested') if rev in get(repo, 'ignored'): # i18n: bisect changeset status return _('ignored') # Try implicit sets if rev in get(repo, 'goods'): # i18n: bisect changeset status return _('good (implicit)') if rev in get(repo, 'bads'): # i18n: bisect changeset status return _('bad (implicit)') return None def printresult(ui, repo, state, displayer, nodes, good): repo = repo.unfiltered() if len(nodes) == 1: # narrowed it down to a single revision if good: ui.write(_("The first good revision is:\n")) else: ui.write(_("The first bad revision is:\n")) displayer.show(repo[nodes[0]]) extendnode = extendrange(repo, state, nodes, good) if extendnode is not None: ui.write(_('Not all ancestors of this changeset have been' ' checked.\nUse bisect --extend to continue the ' 'bisection from\nthe common ancestor, %s.\n') % extendnode) else: # multiple possible revisions if good: ui.write(_("Due to skipped revisions, the first " "good revision could be any of:\n")) else: ui.write(_("Due to skipped revisions, the first " "bad revision could be any of:\n")) for n in nodes: displayer.show(repo[n]) displayer.close()