view tests/test-merge-prompt.t @ 25708:d3d32643c060

wireproto: correctly escape batched args and responses (issue4739)

This issue appears to be as old as wireproto batching itself: I can
reproduce the failure as far back as 08ef6b5f3715 trivially by
rebasing the test changes in this patch, which was back in the 1.9
era. I didn't test before that change, because prior to that the
testfile has a different name and I'm lazy.

Note that the test thought it was checking this case, but it actually
wasn't: it put a literal ; in the arg and response for its greet
command, but the mangle/unmangle step defined in the test meant that
instead of "Fo, =;o" going over the wire, "Gp-!><p" went instead,
which doesn't contain any special characters (those being [.=;]) and
thus not exercising the escaping. The test has been updated to use
pre-unmangled special characters, so the request is now "Fo+<:o",
which mangles to "Gp,=;p". I have confirmed that the test fails
without the adjustment to the escaping rules in wireproto.py.

No existing clients of RPC batching were depending on the old behavior
in any way. The only *actual* users of batchable RPCs in core were:

1) largefiles, wherein it batches up many statlfile calls. It sends
hexlified hashes over the wire and gets a 0, 1, or 2 back as a
response. No risk of special characters.

2) setdiscovery, which was using heads() and known(), both of which
communicate via hexlified nodes. Again, no risk of special characters.

Since the escaping functionality has been completely broken since it
was introduced, we know that it has no users. As such, we can change
the escaping mechanism without having to worry about backwards
compatibility issues.

For the curious, this was detected by chance: it happens that the
lz4-compressed text of a test file for remotefilelog compressed to
something containing a ;, which then caused the failure when I moved
remotefilelog to using batching for file content fetching.

Test for
b5605d88dc27: Make ui.prompt repeat on "unrecognized response" again
 (issue897)

840e2b315c1f: Fix misleading error and prompts during update/merge
 (issue556)

  $ status() {
  >     echo "--- status ---"
  >     hg st -A file1 file2
  >     for file in file1 file2; do
  >         if [ -f $file ]; then
  >             echo "--- $file ---"
  >             cat $file
  >         else
  >             echo "*** $file does not exist"
  >         fi
  >     done
  > }

  $ hg init

  $ echo 1 > file1
  $ echo 2 > file2
  $ hg ci -Am 'added file1 and file2'
  adding file1
  adding file2

  $ hg rm file1
  $ echo changed >> file2
  $ hg ci -m 'removed file1, changed file2'

  $ hg co 0
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo changed >> file1
  $ hg rm file2
  $ hg ci -m 'changed file1, removed file2'
  created new head


Non-interactive merge:

  $ hg merge -y
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? c
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ status
  --- status ---
  M file2
  C file1
  --- file1 ---
  1
  changed
  --- file2 ---
  2
  changed


Interactive merge:

  $ hg co -C
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
  > c
  > d
  > EOF
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? c
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? d
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ status
  --- status ---
  file2: * (glob)
  C file1
  --- file1 ---
  1
  changed
  *** file2 does not exist


Interactive merge with bad input:

  $ hg co -C
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
  > foo
  > bar
  > d
  > baz
  > c
  > EOF
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? foo
  unrecognized response
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? bar
  unrecognized response
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? d
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? baz
  unrecognized response
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ status
  --- status ---
  M file2
  R file1
  *** file1 does not exist
  --- file2 ---
  2
  changed


Interactive merge with not enough input:

  $ hg co -C
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF
  > d
  > EOF
  local changed file1 which remote deleted
  use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? d
  remote changed file2 which local deleted
  use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? abort: response expected
  [255]

  $ status
  --- status ---
  file2: * (glob)
  C file1
  --- file1 ---
  1
  changed
  *** file2 does not exist