Mercurial > hg
view CONTRIBUTING @ 44644:dbe9182c90f5
phabricator: combine commit messages into the review when folding commits
No visible changes here, until an option to enable it is added to `phabsend`.
This combines the Differential fields like Arcanist does, rather than simply
concatenating the text blocks. Aside from populating everything properly in the
web interface, Phabricator fails the review create/update if repeated fields are
seen as would happen with simple concatenation.
On the flip side, now that the Summary and Test Plan fields can contain data
from multiple commits, we can't just join these fields together to determine if
an amend is needed. If that were to happen, every single commit in the folded
range would get amended with the combined commit message, which seems clearly
wrong. Aside from making a minor assumption about the content of the
Differential Revision field (it seems they allow some minor variances with
spacing), this means that for folded reviews, you can't post it, go to the web
page add a missing Test Plan, and then get it added to the commit message by
re-posting it. I don't think that's a big deal.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8309
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:03:04 -0500 |
parents | a492610a2fc1 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
Our full contribution guidelines are in our wiki, please see: https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ContributingChanges If you just want a checklist to follow, you can go straight to https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/ContributingChanges#Submission_checklist If you can't run the entire testsuite for some reason (it can be difficult on Windows), please at least run `contrib/check-code.py` on any files you've modified and run `python contrib/check-commit` on any commits you've made (for example, `python contrib/check-commit 273ce12ad8f1` will report some style violations on a very old commit).