Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-push-checkheads-superceed-A7.t @ 44644:dbe9182c90f5
phabricator: combine commit messages into the review when folding commits
No visible changes here, until an option to enable it is added to `phabsend`.
This combines the Differential fields like Arcanist does, rather than simply
concatenating the text blocks. Aside from populating everything properly in the
web interface, Phabricator fails the review create/update if repeated fields are
seen as would happen with simple concatenation.
On the flip side, now that the Summary and Test Plan fields can contain data
from multiple commits, we can't just join these fields together to determine if
an amend is needed. If that were to happen, every single commit in the folded
range would get amended with the combined commit message, which seems clearly
wrong. Aside from making a minor assumption about the content of the
Differential Revision field (it seems they allow some minor variances with
spacing), this means that for folded reviews, you can't post it, go to the web
page add a missing Test Plan, and then get it added to the commit message by
re-posting it. I don't think that's a big deal.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D8309
author | Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> |
---|---|
date | Fri, 06 Mar 2020 17:03:04 -0500 |
parents | 34a46d48d24e |
children | 5996640fc6fe |
line wrap: on
line source
==================================== Testing head checking code: Case A-7 ==================================== Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by some of the new one we push. This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior. Category A: simple case involving a branch being superceeded by another. TestCase 7: multi-changeset branch, split on multiple other, (head on its own branch), same number of head .. old-state: .. .. * 2 branch (1-changeset, and 2-changesets) .. .. new-state: .. .. * 1 new branch superceeding the head of the old-2-changesets-branch, .. * 1 new changesets on the old-1-changeset-branch superceeding the base of the other .. .. expected-result: .. .. * push allowed .. .. graph-summary: .. .. B ø⇠◔ B' .. | | .. A'◔⇢ø | .. | |/ .. C ● | .. \| .. ● $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh Test setup ---------- $ mkdir A7 $ cd A7 $ setuprepos creating basic server and client repo updating to branch default 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd server $ mkcommit B0 $ hg up 0 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkcommit C0 created new head $ cd ../client $ hg pull pulling from $TESTTMP/A7/server searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) new changesets d73caddc5533:0f88766e02d6 (2 drafts) (run 'hg heads' to see heads, 'hg merge' to merge) $ hg up 'desc(C0)' 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkcommit A1 $ hg up 0 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ mkcommit B1 created new head $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"` 1 new obsolescence markers obsoleted 1 changesets 1 new orphan changesets $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(B0)" ` `getid "desc(B1)"` 1 new obsolescence markers obsoleted 1 changesets $ hg log -G --hidden @ 25c56d33e4c4 (draft): B1 | | o a0802eb7fc1b (draft): A1 | | | o 0f88766e02d6 (draft): C0 |/ | x d73caddc5533 (draft): B0 | | | x 8aaa48160adc (draft): A0 |/ o 1e4be0697311 (public): root Actual testing -------------- $ hg push pushing to $TESTTMP/A7/server searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 2 changes to 2 files (+1 heads) 2 new obsolescence markers obsoleted 2 changesets $ cd ../..