view tests/test-push-checkheads-unpushed-D3.t @ 49000:dd6b67d5c256 stable

rust: fix unsound `OwningDirstateMap` As per the previous patch, `OwningDirstateMap` is unsound. Self-referential structs are difficult to implement correctly in Rust since the compiler is free to move structs around as much as it wants to. They are also very rarely needed in practice, so the state-of-the-art on how they should be done within the Rust rules is still a bit new. The crate `ouroboros` is an attempt at providing a safe way (in the Rust sense) of declaring self-referential structs. It is getting a lot attention and was improved very quickly when soundness issues were found in the past: rather than relying on our own (limited) review circle, we might as well use the de-facto common crate to fix this problem. This will give us a much better chance of finding issues should any new ones be discovered as well as the benefit of fewer `unsafe` APIs of our own. I was starting to think about how I would present a safe API to the old struct but soon realized that the callback-based approach was already done in `ouroboros`, along with a lot more care towards refusing incorrect structs. In short: we don't return a mutable reference to the `DirstateMap` anymore, we expect users of its API to pass a `FnOnce` that takes the map as an argument. This allows our `OwningDirstateMap` to control the input and output lifetimes of the code that modifies it to prevent such issues. Changing to `ouroboros` meant changing every API with it, but it is relatively low churn in the end. It correctly identified the example buggy modification of `copy_map_insert` outlined in the previous patch as violating the borrow rules. Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D12429
author Raphaël Gomès <rgomes@octobus.net>
date Tue, 05 Apr 2022 10:55:28 +0200
parents 9261f6c1d39b
children
line wrap: on
line source

====================================
Testing head checking code: Case D-3
====================================

Mercurial checks for the introduction of new heads on push. Evolution comes
into play to detect if existing branches on the server are being replaced by
some of the new one we push.

This case is part of a series of tests checking this behavior.

Category D: remote head is "obs-affected" locally, but result is not part of the push
TestCase 3: multi-changeset branch, split on multiple new others, only one of them is pushed

.. old-state:
..
.. * 2 changesets branch
..
.. new-state:
..
.. * 2 new branches, each superseding one changeset in the old one.
..
.. expected-result:
..
.. * pushing only one of the resulting branch (either of them)
.. * push denied
..
.. graph-summary:
..
.. B'◔⇢ø B
..   | |
.. A | ø⇠◔ A'
..   | |/
..    \|
..     ●

  $ . $TESTDIR/testlib/push-checkheads-util.sh

Test setup
----------

  $ mkdir D3
  $ cd D3
  $ setuprepos
  creating basic server and client repo
  updating to branch default
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd server
  $ mkcommit B0
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cd ../client
  $ hg pull
  pulling from $TESTTMP/D3/server
  searching for changes
  adding changesets
  adding manifests
  adding file changes
  added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
  new changesets d73caddc5533 (1 drafts)
  (run 'hg update' to get a working copy)
  $ hg up 0
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit A1
  created new head
  $ hg up '0'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ mkcommit B1
  created new head
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(A0)" ` `getid "desc(A1)"`
  1 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  1 new orphan changesets
  $ hg debugobsolete `getid "desc(B0)" ` `getid "desc(B1)"`
  1 new obsolescence markers
  obsoleted 1 changesets
  $ hg log -G --hidden
  @  25c56d33e4c4 (draft): B1
  |
  | o  f6082bc4ffef (draft): A1
  |/
  | x  d73caddc5533 (draft): B0
  | |
  | x  8aaa48160adc (draft): A0
  |/
  o  1e4be0697311 (public): root
  

Actual testing
--------------

  $ hg push --rev 'desc(A1)'
  pushing to $TESTTMP/D3/server
  searching for changes
  abort: push creates new remote head f6082bc4ffef
  (merge or see 'hg help push' for details about pushing new heads)
  [20]
  $ hg push --rev 'desc(B1)'
  pushing to $TESTTMP/D3/server
  searching for changes
  abort: push creates new remote head 25c56d33e4c4
  (merge or see 'hg help push' for details about pushing new heads)
  [20]

Extra testing
-------------

In this case, even a bare push is creating more heads

  $ hg push
  pushing to $TESTTMP/D3/server
  searching for changes
  abort: push creates new remote head 25c56d33e4c4
  (merge or see 'hg help push' for details about pushing new heads)
  [20]

  $ cd ../..