view tests/test-bisect2.t @ 49777:e1953a34c110

bundle: emit full snapshot as is, without doing a redelta With the new `forced` delta-reused policy, it become important to be able to send full snapshot where full snapshot are needed. Otherwise, the fallback delta will simply be used on the client sideā€¦ creating monstrous delta chain, since revision that are meant as a reset of delta-chain chain becoming too complex are simply adding a new full delta-tree on the leaf of another one. In the `non-forced` cases, client process full snapshot from the bundle differently from deltas, so client will still try to convert the full snapshot into a delta if possible. So this will no lead to pathological storage explosion. I have considered making this configurable, but the impact seems limited enough that it does not seems to be worth it. Especially with the current sparse-revlog format that use "delta-tree" with multiple level snapshots, full snapshot are much less frequent and not that different from other intermediate snapshot that we are already sending over the wire anyway. CPU wise, this will help the bundling side a little as it will not need to reconstruct revisions and compute deltas. The unbundling side might save a tiny amount of CPU as it won't need to reconstruct the delta-base to reconstruct the revision full text. This only slightly visible in some of the benchmarks. And have no real impact on most of them. ### data-env-vars.name = pypy-2018-08-01-zstd-sparse-revlog # benchmark.name = perf-bundle # benchmark.variants.revs = last-40000 before: 11.467186 seconds just-emit-full: 11.190576 seconds (-2.41%) with-pull-force: 11.041091 seconds (-3.72%) # benchmark.name = perf-unbundle # benchmark.variants.revs = last-40000 before: 16.744862 just-emit-full:: 16.561036 seconds (-1.10%) with-pull-force: 16.389344 seconds (-2.12%) # benchmark.name = pull # benchmark.variants.revs = last-40000 before: 26.870569 just-emit-full: 26.391188 seconds (-1.78%) with-pull-force: 25.633184 seconds (-4.60%) Space wise (so network-wise) the impact is fairly small. When taking compression into account. Below are tests the size of `hg bundle --all` for a handful of benchmark repositories (with bzip, zstd compression and without it) This show a small increase in the bundle size, but nothing really significant except maybe for mozilla-try (+12%) that nobody really pulls large chunk of anyway. Mozilla-try is also the repository that benefit the most for not having to recompute deltas client size. ### mercurial: bzip-before: 26 406 342 bytes bzip-after: 26 691 543 bytes +1.08% zstd-before: 27 918 645 bytes zstd-after: 28 075 896 bytes +0.56% none-before: 98 675 601 bytes none-after: 100 411 237 bytes +1.76% ### pypy bzip-before: 201 295 752 bytes bzip-after: 209 780 282 bytes +4.21% zstd-before: 202 974 795 bytes zstd-after: 205 165 780 bytes +1.08% none-before: 871 070 261 bytes none-after: 993 595 057 bytes +14.07% ### netbeans bzip-before: 601 314 330 bytes bzip-after: 614 246 241 bytes +2.15% zstd-before: 604 745 136 bytes zstd-after: 615 497 705 bytes +1.78% none-before: 3 338 238 571 bytes none-after: 3 439 422 535 bytes +3.03% ### mozilla-central bzip-before: 1 493 006 921 bytes bzip-after: 1 549 650 570 bytes +3.79% zstd-before: 1 481 910 102 bytes zstd-after: 1 513 052 415 bytes +2.10% none-before: 6 535 929 910 bytes none-after: 7 010 191 342 bytes +7.26% ### mozilla-try bzip-before: 6 583 425 999 bytes bzip-after: 7 423 536 928 bytes +12.76% zstd-before: 6 021 009 212 bytes zstd-after: 6 674 922 420 bytes +10.86% none-before: 22 954 739 558 bytes none-after: 26 013 854 771 bytes +13.32%
author Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
date Wed, 07 Dec 2022 20:12:23 +0100
parents 816236523765
children 8ced4ca30ea1
line wrap: on
line source

# The tests in test-bisect are done on a linear history. Here the
# following repository history is used for testing:
#
#                      17
#                       |
#                18    16
#                  \  /
#                   15
#                  /  \
#                 /    \
#               10     13
#               / \     |
#              /   \    |  14
#         7   6     9  12 /
#          \ / \    |   |/
#           4   \   |  11
#            \   \  |  /
#             3   5 | /
#              \ /  |/
#               2   8
#                \ /
#                 1
#                 |
#                 0

init

  $ hg init

committing changes

  $ echo > a
  $ echo '0' >> a
  $ hg add a
  $ hg ci -m "0" -d "0 0"
  $ echo '1' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "1" -d "1 0"
  $ echo '2' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "2" -d "2 0"
  $ echo '3' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "3" -d "3 0"
  $ echo '4' >> a
  $ hg ci -m "4" -d "4 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 2
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '5' >> b
  $ hg add b
  $ hg ci -m "5" -d "5 0"
  created new head

merge

  $ hg merge
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 4,5" -d "6 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 4
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '7' > c
  $ hg add c
  $ hg ci -m "7" -d "7 0"
  created new head

create branch

  $ hg up -r 1
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '8' > d
  $ hg add d
  $ hg ci -m "8" -d "8 0"
  created new head
  $ echo '9' >> d
  $ hg ci -m "9" -d "9 0"

merge

  $ hg merge -r 6
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 6,9" -d "10 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 8
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '11' > e
  $ hg add e
  $ hg ci -m "11" -d "11 0"
  created new head
  $ echo '12' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "12" -d "12 0"
  $ echo '13' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "13" -d "13 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 11
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '14' > f
  $ hg add f
  $ hg ci -m "14" -d "14 0"
  created new head

merge

  $ hg up -r 13 -C
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg merge -r 10
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ hg ci -m "merge 10,13" -d "15 0"
  $ echo '16' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "16" -d "16 0"
  $ echo '17' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "17" -d "17 0"

create branch

  $ hg up -r 15
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ echo '18' >> e
  $ hg ci -m "18" -d "18 0"
  created new head

log

  $ hg log
  changeset:   18:d42e18c7bc9b
  tag:         tip
  parent:      15:857b178a7cf3
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:18 1970 +0000
  summary:     18
  
  changeset:   17:228c06deef46
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000
  summary:     17
  
  changeset:   16:609d82a7ebae
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000
  summary:     16
  
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  changeset:   14:faa450606157
  parent:      11:82ca6f06eccd
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:14 1970 +0000
  summary:     14
  
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  changeset:   12:9f259202bbe7
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:12 1970 +0000
  summary:     12
  
  changeset:   11:82ca6f06eccd
  parent:      8:dab8161ac8fc
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000
  summary:     11
  
  changeset:   10:429fcd26f52d
  parent:      9:3c77083deb4a
  parent:      6:a214d5d3811a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 6,9
  
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  changeset:   8:dab8161ac8fc
  parent:      1:4ca5088da217
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:08 1970 +0000
  summary:     8
  
  changeset:   7:50c76098bbf2
  parent:      4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:07 1970 +0000
  summary:     7
  
  changeset:   6:a214d5d3811a
  parent:      5:385a529b6670
  parent:      4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:06 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 4,5
  
  changeset:   5:385a529b6670
  parent:      2:051e12f87bf1
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:05 1970 +0000
  summary:     5
  
  changeset:   4:5c668c22234f
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:04 1970 +0000
  summary:     4
  
  changeset:   3:0950834f0a9c
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:03 1970 +0000
  summary:     3
  
  changeset:   2:051e12f87bf1
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:02 1970 +0000
  summary:     2
  
  changeset:   1:4ca5088da217
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:01 1970 +0000
  summary:     1
  
  changeset:   0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     0
  

hg up -C

  $ hg up -C
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  updated to "d42e18c7bc9b: 18"
  3 other heads for branch "default"

complex bisect test 1  # first bad rev is 9

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 0
  $ hg bisect -b 17   # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a "merge 4,5" (15 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 "13" (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d "merge 6,9" (9 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 8
  Testing changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc "8" (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 9
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a "9" (2 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

complex bisect test 2  # first good rev is 13

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 18
  $ hg bisect -b 1    # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a "merge 4,5" (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d "merge 6,9" (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  6:a214d5d3811a
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 12
  Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 "12" (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 "13" (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -g
  The first good revision is:
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

complex bisect test 3

first bad rev is 15
10,9,13 are skipped an might be the first bad revisions as well

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 1
  $ hg bisect -b 16   # -> update to rev 6
  Testing changeset 6:a214d5d3811a "merge 4,5" (13 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 "13" (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d "merge 6,9" (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 12
  Testing changeset 12:9f259202bbe7 "12" (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -g      # -> update to rev 9
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a "9" (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 15
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 "merge 10,13" (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  $ hg bisect -b
  Due to skipped revisions, the first bad revision could be any of:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  changeset:   10:429fcd26f52d
  parent:      9:3c77083deb4a
  parent:      6:a214d5d3811a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:10 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 6,9
  
  changeset:   13:b0a32c86eb31
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:13 1970 +0000
  summary:     13
  
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'

complex bisect test 4

first good revision is 17
15,16 are skipped an might be the first good revisions as well

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -g 17
  $ hg bisect -b 8    # -> update to rev 10
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 "13" (8 changesets remaining, ~3 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 13
  Testing changeset 10:429fcd26f52d "merge 6,9" (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b      # -> update to rev 15
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 "merge 10,13" (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -s      # -> update to rev 16
  Testing changeset 16:609d82a7ebae "16" (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg bisect -s
  Due to skipped revisions, the first good revision could be any of:
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  changeset:   16:609d82a7ebae
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:16 1970 +0000
  summary:     16
  
  changeset:   17:228c06deef46
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:17 1970 +0000
  summary:     17
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46

test unrelated revs:

  $ hg bisect --reset
  $ hg bisect -b 7
  $ hg bisect -g 14
  abort: starting revisions are not directly related
  [255]
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  7:50c76098bbf2
  14:faa450606157
  $ hg bisect --reset

end at merge: 17 bad, 11 good (but 9 is first bad)

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -b 17
  $ hg bisect -g 11
  Testing changeset 13:b0a32c86eb31 "13" (5 changesets remaining, ~2 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect -g
  Testing changeset 15:857b178a7cf3 "merge 10,13" (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  3 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   15:857b178a7cf3
  parent:      13:b0a32c86eb31
  parent:      10:429fcd26f52d
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:15 1970 +0000
  summary:     merge 10,13
  
  Not all ancestors of this changeset have been checked.
  Use bisect --extend to continue the bisection from
  the common ancestor, dab8161ac8fc.
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect --extend
  Extending search to changeset 8:dab8161ac8fc "8"
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg bisect -g # dab8161ac8fc
  Testing changeset 9:3c77083deb4a "9" (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   9:3c77083deb4a
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:09 1970 +0000
  summary:     9
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(ignored)'
  2:051e12f87bf1
  3:0950834f0a9c
  4:5c668c22234f
  5:385a529b6670
  6:a214d5d3811a
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(goods)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(bads)'
  9:3c77083deb4a
  10:429fcd26f52d
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b

user adds irrelevant but consistent information (here: -g 2) to bisect state

  $ hg bisect -r
  $ hg bisect -b 13
  $ hg bisect -g 8
  Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd "11" (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg bisect -g 2
  Testing changeset 11:82ca6f06eccd "11" (3 changesets remaining, ~1 tests)
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  $ hg bisect -b
  The first bad revision is:
  changeset:   11:82ca6f06eccd
  parent:      8:dab8161ac8fc
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:11 1970 +0000
  summary:     11
  
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(range)'
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(pruned)'
  0:33b1f9bc8bc5
  1:4ca5088da217
  8:dab8161ac8fc
  11:82ca6f06eccd
  12:9f259202bbe7
  13:b0a32c86eb31
  14:faa450606157
  15:857b178a7cf3
  16:609d82a7ebae
  17:228c06deef46
  18:d42e18c7bc9b
  $ hg log -q -r 'bisect(untested)'