Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-ancestor.py @ 27430:e240e914d226 stable
revlog: seek to end of file before writing (issue4943)
Revlogs were recently refactored to open file handles in "a+" and use a
persistent file handle for reading and writing. This drastically
reduced the number of file handles being opened.
Unfortunately, it appears that some versions of Solaris lose the file
offset when performing a write after the handle has been seeked.
The simplest workaround is to seek to EOF on files opened in a+ mode
before writing to them, which is what this patch does.
Ideally, this code would exist in the vfs layer. However, this would
require creating a proxy class for file objects in order to provide a
custom implementation of write(). This would add overhead. Since
revlogs are the only files we open in a+ mode, the one-off workaround
in revlog.py should be sufficient.
This patch appears to have little to no impact on performance on my
Linux machine.
author | Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 17 Dec 2015 17:16:02 -0800 |
parents | f710644e1ce9 |
children | 4056fdf71aff |
line wrap: on
line source
from mercurial import ancestor, commands, hg, ui, util from mercurial.node import nullrev import binascii, getopt, math, os, random, sys, time def buildgraph(rng, nodes=100, rootprob=0.05, mergeprob=0.2, prevprob=0.7): '''nodes: total number of nodes in the graph rootprob: probability that a new node (not 0) will be a root mergeprob: probability that, excluding a root a node will be a merge prevprob: probability that p1 will be the previous node return value is a graph represented as an adjacency list. ''' graph = [None] * nodes for i in xrange(nodes): if i == 0 or rng.random() < rootprob: graph[i] = [nullrev] elif i == 1: graph[i] = [0] elif rng.random() < mergeprob: if i == 2 or rng.random() < prevprob: # p1 is prev p1 = i - 1 else: p1 = rng.randrange(i - 1) p2 = rng.choice(range(0, p1) + range(p1 + 1, i)) graph[i] = [p1, p2] elif rng.random() < prevprob: graph[i] = [i - 1] else: graph[i] = [rng.randrange(i - 1)] return graph def buildancestorsets(graph): ancs = [None] * len(graph) for i in xrange(len(graph)): ancs[i] = set([i]) if graph[i] == [nullrev]: continue for p in graph[i]: ancs[i].update(ancs[p]) return ancs class naiveincrementalmissingancestors(object): def __init__(self, ancs, bases): self.ancs = ancs self.bases = set(bases) def addbases(self, newbases): self.bases.update(newbases) def removeancestorsfrom(self, revs): for base in self.bases: if base != nullrev: revs.difference_update(self.ancs[base]) revs.discard(nullrev) def missingancestors(self, revs): res = set() for rev in revs: if rev != nullrev: res.update(self.ancs[rev]) for base in self.bases: if base != nullrev: res.difference_update(self.ancs[base]) return sorted(res) def test_missingancestors(seed, rng): # empirically observed to take around 1 second graphcount = 100 testcount = 10 inccount = 10 nerrs = [0] # the default mu and sigma give us a nice distribution of mostly # single-digit counts (including 0) with some higher ones def lognormrandom(mu, sigma): return int(math.floor(rng.lognormvariate(mu, sigma))) def samplerevs(nodes, mu=1.1, sigma=0.8): count = min(lognormrandom(mu, sigma), len(nodes)) return rng.sample(nodes, count) def err(seed, graph, bases, seq, output, expected): if nerrs[0] == 0: print >> sys.stderr, 'seed:', hex(seed)[:-1] if gerrs[0] == 0: print >> sys.stderr, 'graph:', graph print >> sys.stderr, '* bases:', bases print >> sys.stderr, '* seq: ', seq print >> sys.stderr, '* output: ', output print >> sys.stderr, '* expected:', expected nerrs[0] += 1 gerrs[0] += 1 for g in xrange(graphcount): graph = buildgraph(rng) ancs = buildancestorsets(graph) gerrs = [0] for _ in xrange(testcount): # start from nullrev to include it as a possibility graphnodes = range(nullrev, len(graph)) bases = samplerevs(graphnodes) # fast algorithm inc = ancestor.incrementalmissingancestors(graph.__getitem__, bases) # reference slow algorithm naiveinc = naiveincrementalmissingancestors(ancs, bases) seq = [] revs = [] for _ in xrange(inccount): if rng.random() < 0.2: newbases = samplerevs(graphnodes) seq.append(('addbases', newbases)) inc.addbases(newbases) naiveinc.addbases(newbases) if rng.random() < 0.4: # larger set so that there are more revs to remove from revs = samplerevs(graphnodes, mu=1.5) seq.append(('removeancestorsfrom', revs)) hrevs = set(revs) rrevs = set(revs) inc.removeancestorsfrom(hrevs) naiveinc.removeancestorsfrom(rrevs) if hrevs != rrevs: err(seed, graph, bases, seq, sorted(hrevs), sorted(rrevs)) else: revs = samplerevs(graphnodes) seq.append(('missingancestors', revs)) h = inc.missingancestors(revs) r = naiveinc.missingancestors(revs) if h != r: err(seed, graph, bases, seq, h, r) # graph is a dict of child->parent adjacency lists for this graph: # o 13 # | # | o 12 # | | # | | o 11 # | | |\ # | | | | o 10 # | | | | | # | o---+ | 9 # | | | | | # o | | | | 8 # / / / / # | | o | 7 # | | | | # o---+ | 6 # / / / # | | o 5 # | |/ # | o 4 # | | # o | 3 # | | # | o 2 # |/ # o 1 # | # o 0 graph = {0: [-1], 1: [0], 2: [1], 3: [1], 4: [2], 5: [4], 6: [4], 7: [4], 8: [-1], 9: [6, 7], 10: [5], 11: [3, 7], 12: [9], 13: [8]} def genlazyancestors(revs, stoprev=0, inclusive=False): print ("%% lazy ancestor set for %s, stoprev = %s, inclusive = %s" % (revs, stoprev, inclusive)) return ancestor.lazyancestors(graph.get, revs, stoprev=stoprev, inclusive=inclusive) def printlazyancestors(s, l): print 'membership: %r' % [n for n in l if n in s] print 'iteration: %r' % list(s) def test_lazyancestors(): # Empty revs s = genlazyancestors([]) printlazyancestors(s, [3, 0, -1]) # Standard example s = genlazyancestors([11, 13]) printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0]) # Standard with ancestry in the initial set (1 is ancestor of 3) s = genlazyancestors([1, 3]) printlazyancestors(s, [1, -1, 0]) # Including revs s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], inclusive=True) printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0]) # Test with stoprev s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6) printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0]) s = genlazyancestors([11, 13], stoprev=6, inclusive=True) printlazyancestors(s, [11, 13, 7, 9, 8, 3, 6, 4, 1, -1, 0]) # The C gca algorithm requires a real repo. These are textual descriptions of # DAGs that have been known to be problematic. dagtests = [ '+2*2*2/*3/2', '+3*3/*2*2/*4*4/*4/2*4/2*2', ] def test_gca(): u = ui.ui() for i, dag in enumerate(dagtests): repo = hg.repository(u, 'gca%d' % i, create=1) cl = repo.changelog if not util.safehasattr(cl.index, 'ancestors'): # C version not available return commands.debugbuilddag(u, repo, dag) # Compare the results of the Python and C versions. This does not # include choosing a winner when more than one gca exists -- we make # sure both return exactly the same set of gcas. for a in cl: for b in cl: cgcas = sorted(cl.index.ancestors(a, b)) pygcas = sorted(ancestor.ancestors(cl.parentrevs, a, b)) if cgcas != pygcas: print "test_gca: for dag %s, gcas for %d, %d:" % (dag, a, b) print " C returned: %s" % cgcas print " Python returned: %s" % pygcas def main(): seed = None opts, args = getopt.getopt(sys.argv[1:], 's:', ['seed=']) for o, a in opts: if o in ('-s', '--seed'): seed = long(a, base=0) # accepts base 10 or 16 strings if seed is None: try: seed = long(binascii.hexlify(os.urandom(16)), 16) except AttributeError: seed = long(time.time() * 1000) rng = random.Random(seed) test_missingancestors(seed, rng) test_lazyancestors() test_gca() if __name__ == '__main__': main()