pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches
After a pull when new heads are added but no head is added on the current
branch, the "run 'hg merge'" message can be misleading. This patch doesn't
output the merge message in that scenario.
$ mkdir t
$ cd t
$ hg init
$ echo 1 > a
$ hg ci -qAm "first"
$ hg cp a b
$ hg mv a c
$ echo 2 >> b
$ echo 2 >> c
$ hg ci -qAm "second"
$ hg co -C 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 2 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ echo 0 > a
$ echo 1 >> a
$ hg ci -qAm "other"
$ hg merge --debug
searching for copies back to rev 1
unmatched files in other:
b
c
all copies found (* = to merge, ! = divergent):
c -> a *
b -> a *
checking for directory renames
resolving manifests
overwrite None partial False
ancestor b8bf91eeebbc local add3f11052fa+ remote 17c05bb7fcb6
a: remote moved to c -> m
a: remote moved to b -> m
preserving a for resolve of b
preserving a for resolve of c
removing a
updating: a 1/2 files (50.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for b (binary False symlink False)
merging a and b to b
my b@add3f11052fa+ other b@17c05bb7fcb6 ancestor a@b8bf91eeebbc
premerge successful
updating: a 2/2 files (100.00%)
picked tool 'internal:merge' for c (binary False symlink False)
merging a and c to c
my c@add3f11052fa+ other c@17c05bb7fcb6 ancestor a@b8bf91eeebbc
premerge successful
0 files updated, 2 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
file b
$ cat b
0
1
2
file c
$ cat c
0
1
2