pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches
After a pull when new heads are added but no head is added on the current
branch, the "run 'hg merge'" message can be misleading. This patch doesn't
output the merge message in that scenario.
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue1175
$ hg init
$ touch a
$ hg ci -Am0
adding a
$ hg mv a a1
$ hg ci -m1
$ hg co 0
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg mv a a2
$ hg up
note: possible conflict - a was renamed multiple times to:
a2
a1
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg ci -m2
$ touch a
$ hg ci -Am3
adding a
$ hg mv a b
$ hg ci -Am4 a
$ hg ci --debug --traceback -Am5 b
b
b: searching for copy revision for a
b: copy a:b80de5d138758541c5f05265ad144ab9fa86d1db
committed changeset 5:89e8e4be0de296fa3d6dd7825ccc44d7dc0f1f3b
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
4 files, 6 changesets, 4 total revisions
$ hg export --git tip
# HG changeset patch
# User test
# Date 0 0
# Node ID 89e8e4be0de296fa3d6dd7825ccc44d7dc0f1f3b
# Parent 7fc86ba705e717a721dbc361bf8c9bc05a18ca2f
5
diff --git a/b b/b
new file mode 100644