pull: don't suggest running hg merge when new heads are on different branches
After a pull when new heads are added but no head is added on the current
branch, the "run 'hg merge'" message can be misleading. This patch doesn't
output the merge message in that scenario.
http://mercurial.selenic.com/bts/issue619
$ hg init
$ echo a > a
$ hg ci -Ama
adding a
$ echo b > b
$ hg branch b
marked working directory as branch b
$ hg ci -Amb
adding b
$ hg co -C 0
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
Fast-forward:
$ hg merge b
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
(branch merge, don't forget to commit)
$ hg ci -Ammerge
Bogus fast-forward should fail:
$ hg merge b
abort: merging with a working directory ancestor has no effect
[255]