view tests/test-branch-tag-confict.t @ 36754:e3c228b4510d stable

wireproto: declare operation type for most commands (BC) (SEC) The permissions model of hgweb relies on a dictionary to declare the operation associated with each command - either "pull" or "push." This dictionary was established by d3147b4e3e8a in 2008. Unfortunately, we neglected to update this dictionary as new wire protocol commands were introduced. This commit defines the operations of most wire protocol commands in the permissions dictionary. The "batch" command is omitted because it is special and requires a more complex solution. Since permissions checking is skipped unless a command has an entry in this dictionary (this security issue will be addressed in a subsequent commit), the practical effect of this change is that various wire protocol commands now HTTP 401 if web.deny_read or web.allow-pull, etc are set to deny access. This is reflected by test changes. Note how various `hg pull` and `hg push` operations now fail before discovery. (They fail during the initial "capabilities" request.) This change fixes a security issue where built-in wire protocol commands would return repository data even if the web config were configured to deny access to that data. I'm on the fence as to whether we should HTTP 401 the capabilities request. On one hand, it can expose repository metadata and can tell callers things like what version of Mercurial the server is running. On the other hand, a client may need to know the capabilities in order to authenticate in a follow-up request. It appears that Mercurial clients handle the HTTP 401 on *any* protocol request, so we should be OK sending a 401 for "capabilities." But if this causes problems, it should be possible to allow "capabilities" to always work. .. bc:: Various read-only wire protocol commands now return HTTP 401 Unauthorized if the hgweb configuration denies read/pull access to the repository. Previously, various wire protocol commands would still work and return data if read access was disabled.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Tue, 20 Feb 2018 18:54:27 -0800
parents f2719b387380
children
line wrap: on
line source

Initial setup.

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ touch thefile
  $ hg ci -A -m 'Initial commit.'
  adding thefile

Create a tag.

  $ hg tag branchortag

Create a branch with the same name as the tag.

  $ hg branch branchortag
  marked working directory as branch branchortag
  (branches are permanent and global, did you want a bookmark?)
  $ hg ci -m 'Create a branch with the same name as a tag.'

This is what we have:

  $ hg log
  changeset:   2:10519b3f489a
  branch:      branchortag
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Create a branch with the same name as a tag.
  
  changeset:   1:2635c45ca99b
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Added tag branchortag for changeset f57387372b5d
  
  changeset:   0:f57387372b5d
  tag:         branchortag
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Initial commit.
  
Update to the tag:

  $ hg up 'tag(branchortag)'
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents
  changeset:   0:f57387372b5d
  tag:         branchortag
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Initial commit.
  
Updating to the branch:

  $ hg up 'branch(branchortag)'
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg parents
  changeset:   2:10519b3f489a
  branch:      branchortag
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     Create a branch with the same name as a tag.
  

  $ cd ..