tests/test-mq-qpush-fail
author Brendan Cully <brendan@kublai.com>
Mon, 29 Jun 2009 00:54:23 -0700
changeset 8954 e67e5b60e55f
parent 8875 801cacf46e62
child 9590 07a62819b309
permissions -rwxr-xr-x
Branch heads should not include "heads" that are ancestors of other heads. For example, given 1 (branch a) -> 2 (branch b) -> 3 (branch a) I expect "hg heads a" to show only 3. Discovered by running hg heads HEAD on the mutt repo, where older clients committed default on top of HEAD.

#!/bin/sh

# Test that qpush cleans things up if it doesn't complete

echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
echo "mq=" >> $HGRCPATH

hg init repo
cd repo

echo foo > foo
hg ci -Am 'add foo'

touch untracked-file
echo 'syntax: glob' > .hgignore
echo '.hgignore' >> .hgignore

hg qinit

echo '% test qpush on empty series'
hg qpush

hg qnew patch1
echo >> foo
hg qrefresh -m 'patch 1'

hg qnew patch2
echo bar > bar
hg add bar
hg qrefresh -m 'patch 2'

hg qnew bad-patch
echo >> foo
hg qrefresh

hg qpop -a

python -c 'print "\xe9"' > message
cat .hg/patches/bad-patch >> message
mv message .hg/patches/bad-patch

hg qpush -a && echo 'qpush succeded?!'

hg parents

echo '% bar should be gone; other unknown/ignored files should still be around'
hg status -A

echo '% preparing qpush of a missing patch'
hg qpop -a
hg qpush
rm .hg/patches/patch2
echo '% now we expect the push to fail, but it should NOT complain about patch1'
hg qpush

true # happy ending