Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-patch.t @ 34258:e71890f27767
bundle2: move processpart stream maintenance into part iterator
The processpart function also did some stream maintenance, so let's move it to
the part iterator as well, as part of moving all part iteration logic into the
class.
There is one place processpart is called outside of the normal loop, so we
manually handle the seek there.
The now-empty try/finally will be removed in a later patch, for ease of review.
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D706
author | Durham Goode <durham@fb.com> |
---|---|
date | Thu, 14 Sep 2017 10:20:05 -0700 |
parents | b1f75d8e887a |
children | eb586ed5d8ce |
line wrap: on
line source
$ cat > patchtool.py <<EOF > from __future__ import absolute_import, print_function > import sys > print('Using custom patch') > if '--binary' in sys.argv: > print('--binary found !') > EOF $ echo "[ui]" >> $HGRCPATH $ echo "patch=$PYTHON ../patchtool.py" >> $HGRCPATH $ hg init a $ cd a $ echo a > a $ hg commit -Ama -d '1 0' adding a $ echo b >> a $ hg commit -Amb -d '2 0' $ cd .. This test checks that: - custom patch commands with arguments actually work - patch code does not try to add weird arguments like --binary when custom patch commands are used. For instance --binary is added by default under win32. check custom patch options are honored $ hg --cwd a export -o ../a.diff tip $ hg clone -r 0 a b adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg --cwd b import -v ../a.diff applying ../a.diff Using custom patch applied to working directory Issue2417: hg import with # comments in description Prepare source repo and patch: $ rm $HGRCPATH $ hg init c $ cd c $ printf "a\rc" > a $ hg ci -A -m 0 a -d '0 0' $ printf "a\rb\rc" > a $ cat << eof > log > first line which can't start with '# ' > # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. > A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: > # HG changeset patch > # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment > eof $ hg ci -l log -d '0 0' $ hg export -o p 1 $ cd .. Clone and apply patch: $ hg clone -r 0 c d adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd d $ hg import ../c/p applying ../c/p $ hg log -v -r 1 changeset: 1:cd0bde79c428 tag: tip user: test date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 files: a description: first line which can't start with '# ' # second line is a comment but that shouldn't be a problem. A patch marker like this was more problematic even after d7452292f9d3: # HG changeset patch # User lines looks like this - but it _is_ just a comment $ cd ..