view tests/test-check-code.t @ 19967:e92c6524a76d stable

largefiles: use 'remote'/'local' in merge prompts like in other merge prompts

Prompts like
  foo has been turned into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep as (n)ormal file?
was not as clear as the usual prompts that use 'remote' or 'local' to explain
what happened on which side ... especially not when used to the normal prompts.

"as" could also indicate that it would be possible to take the content of the
largefile and somehow put it into the normal file. It could make it more clear
that it was a choice between one side or the other.

For consistency we will now phrase it like:
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file?

  $ cat > correct.py <<EOF
  > def toto(arg1, arg2):
  >     del arg2
  >     return (5 + 6, 9)
  > EOF
  $ cat > wrong.py <<EOF
  > def toto( arg1, arg2):
  >     del(arg2)
  >     return ( 5+6, 9)
  > EOF
  $ cat > quote.py <<EOF
  > # let's use quote in comments
  > (''' ( 4x5 )
  > but """\\''' and finally''',
  > """let's fool checkpatch""", '1+2',
  > '"""', 42+1, """and
  > ( 4-1 ) """, "( 1+1 )\" and ")
  > a, '\\\\\\\\', "\\\\\\" x-2", "c-1"
  > EOF
  $ cat > non-py24.py <<EOF
  > # Using builtins that does not exist in Python 2.4
  > if any():
  >     x = all()
  >     y = format(x)
  >     # next(generator) is new in 2.6
  >     z = next(x)
  >     # but generator.next() is okay
  >     x.next()
  >     # and we can make our own next
  >     def next(stuff):
  >         pass
  > 
  > # Do not complain about our own definition
  > def any(x):
  >     pass
  > 
  > # try/except/finally block does not exist in Python 2.4
  >     try:
  >         pass
  >     except StandardError, inst:
  >         pass
  >     finally:
  >         pass
  > 
  > # nested try/finally+try/except is allowed
  >     try:
  >         try:
  >             pass
  >         except StandardError, inst:
  >             pass
  >     finally:
  >         pass
  > 
  > # yield inside a try/finally block is not allowed in Python 2.4
  >     try:
  >         pass
  >         yield 1
  >     finally:
  >         pass
  >     try:
  >         yield
  >         pass
  >     finally:
  >         pass
  > 
  > EOF
  $ cat > classstyle.py <<EOF
  > class newstyle_class(object):
  >     pass
  > 
  > class oldstyle_class:
  >     pass
  > 
  > class empty():
  >     pass
  > 
  > no_class = 1:
  >     pass
  > EOF
  $ check_code="$TESTDIR"/../contrib/check-code.py
  $ "$check_code" ./wrong.py ./correct.py ./quote.py ./non-py24.py ./classstyle.py
  ./wrong.py:1:
   > def toto( arg1, arg2):
   gratuitous whitespace in () or []
  ./wrong.py:2:
   >     del(arg2)
   Python keyword is not a function
  ./wrong.py:3:
   >     return ( 5+6, 9)
   gratuitous whitespace in () or []
   missing whitespace in expression
  ./quote.py:5:
   > '"""', 42+1, """and
   missing whitespace in expression
  ./non-py24.py:2:
   > if any():
   any/all/format not available in Python 2.4
  ./non-py24.py:3:
   >     x = all()
   any/all/format not available in Python 2.4
  ./non-py24.py:4:
   >     y = format(x)
   any/all/format not available in Python 2.4
  ./non-py24.py:6:
   >     z = next(x)
   no next(foo) in Python 2.4 and 2.5, use foo.next() instead
  ./non-py24.py:18:
   >     try:
   no try/except/finally in Python 2.4
  ./non-py24.py:35:
   >     try:
   no yield inside try/finally in Python 2.4
  ./non-py24.py:40:
   >     try:
   no yield inside try/finally in Python 2.4
  ./classstyle.py:4:
   > class oldstyle_class:
   old-style class, use class foo(object)
  ./classstyle.py:7:
   > class empty():
   class foo() not available in Python 2.4, use class foo(object)
  [1]
  $ cat > python3-compat.py << EOF
  > foo <> bar
  > reduce(lambda a, b: a + b, [1, 2, 3, 4])
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" python3-compat.py
  python3-compat.py:1:
   > foo <> bar
   <> operator is not available in Python 3+, use !=
  python3-compat.py:2:
   > reduce(lambda a, b: a + b, [1, 2, 3, 4])
   reduce is not available in Python 3+
  [1]

  $ cat > is-op.py <<EOF
  > # is-operator comparing number or string literal
  > x = None
  > y = x is 'foo'
  > y = x is "foo"
  > y = x is 5346
  > y = x is -6
  > y = x is not 'foo'
  > y = x is not "foo"
  > y = x is not 5346
  > y = x is not -6
  > EOF

  $ "$check_code" ./is-op.py
  ./is-op.py:3:
   > y = x is 'foo'
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:4:
   > y = x is "foo"
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:5:
   > y = x is 5346
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:6:
   > y = x is -6
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:7:
   > y = x is not 'foo'
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:8:
   > y = x is not "foo"
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:9:
   > y = x is not 5346
   object comparison with literal
  ./is-op.py:10:
   > y = x is not -6
   object comparison with literal
  [1]

  $ cat > for-nolineno.py <<EOF
  > except:
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" for-nolineno.py --nolineno
  for-nolineno.py:0:
   > except:
   naked except clause
  [1]

  $ cat > warning.t <<EOF
  >   $ function warnonly {
  >   > }
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" warning.t
  $ "$check_code" --warn warning.t
  warning.t:1:
   >   $ function warnonly {
   warning: don't use 'function', use old style
  [1]
  $ cat > raise-format.py <<EOF
  > raise SomeException, message
  > # this next line is okay
  > raise SomeException(arg1, arg2)
  > EOF
  $ "$check_code" not-existing.py raise-format.py
  Skipping*not-existing.py* (glob)
  raise-format.py:1:
   > raise SomeException, message
   don't use old-style two-argument raise, use Exception(message)
  [1]