Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-merge-prompt.t @ 19432:e92d4b8530cb
hgweb: file diff and changesets views behave like file source view
This gives all the benefits introduced before for file source view, namely
code selection without line numbers and correct indents, highlighting line
which is linked to, long lines wrapping.
Implementation strategy is also the same as for file source view: all the
lines are put in a sigle pre tag with span's for each line. Correct line
numbering (same as before this patch) is achieved with nested CSS counters.
author | Alexander Plavin <me@aplavin.ru> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 13 Jul 2013 00:57:10 +0400 |
parents | c8ba98bf0e71 |
children | 9ab18a912c44 |
line wrap: on
line source
Test for b5605d88dc27: Make ui.prompt repeat on "unrecognized response" again (issue897) 840e2b315c1f: Fix misleading error and prompts during update/merge (issue556) $ status() { > echo "--- status ---" > hg st -A file1 file2 > for file in file1 file2; do > if [ -f $file ]; then > echo "--- $file ---" > cat $file > else > echo "*** $file does not exist" > fi > done > } $ hg init $ echo 1 > file1 $ echo 2 > file2 $ hg ci -Am 'added file1 and file2' adding file1 adding file2 $ hg rm file1 $ echo changed >> file2 $ hg ci -m 'removed file1, changed file2' $ hg co 0 2 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ echo changed >> file1 $ hg rm file2 $ hg ci -m 'changed file1, removed file2' created new head Non-interactive merge: $ hg merge -y local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? c remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? c 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ status --- status --- M file2 C file1 --- file1 --- 1 changed --- file2 --- 2 changed Interactive merge: $ hg co -C 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF > c > d > EOF local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ status --- status --- file2: * (glob) C file1 --- file1 --- 1 changed *** file2 does not exist Interactive merge with bad input: $ hg co -C 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF > foo > bar > d > baz > c > EOF local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? unrecognized response local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? unrecognized response local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? unrecognized response remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ status --- status --- M file2 R file1 *** file1 does not exist --- file2 --- 2 changed Interactive merge with not enough input: $ hg co -C 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ hg merge --config ui.interactive=true <<EOF > d > EOF local changed file1 which remote deleted use (c)hanged version or (d)elete? remote changed file2 which local deleted use (c)hanged version or leave (d)eleted? abort: response expected [255] $ status --- status --- file2: * (glob) C file1 --- file1 --- 1 changed *** file2 does not exist