Mercurial > hg
view tests/test-pull-update.t @ 49672:e92de86cf4f8
emitrevision: consider ancestors revision to emit as available base
This should make more delta base valid. This notably affects:
* case where we skipped some parent with empty delta to directly delta against
an ancestors
* case where an intermediate snapshots is stored.
This change means we could sent largish intermediate snapshots over the wire.
However this is actually a sub goal here. Sending snapshots over the wire means
the client have a high odd of simply storing the pre-computed delta instead of
doing a lengthy process that will… end up doing the same intermediate snapshot.
In addition the overall size of snapshot (or any level) is "only" some or the
overall delta size. (0.17% for my mercurial clone, 20% for my clone of Mozilla
try). So Sending them other the wire is unlikely to change large impact on the
bandwidth used.
If we decide that minimising the bandwidth is an explicit goal, we should
introduce new logic to filter-out snapshot as delta. The current code has no
notion explicite of snapshot so far, they just tended to fall into the wobbly
filtering options.
In some cases, this patch can yield large improvement to the bundling time:
### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2019-02-18-zstd-sparse-revlog
# benchmark.name = perf-bundle
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-100000
before: 68.787066 seconds
after: 47.552677 seconds (-30.87%)
That translate to large improvement to the pull time :
### data-env-vars.name = mozilla-try-2019-02-18-zstd-sparse-revlog
# benchmark.name = pull
# benchmark.variants.issue6528 = disabled
# benchmark.variants.revs = last-100000
before: 142.186625 seconds
after: 75.897745 seconds (-46.62%)
No significant negative impact have been observed.
author | Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> |
---|---|
date | Sat, 12 Nov 2022 00:18:41 +0100 |
parents | ce42fe36d581 |
children |
line wrap: on
line source
$ hg init t $ cd t $ echo 1 > foo $ hg ci -Am m adding foo $ cd .. $ hg clone t tt updating to branch default 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved $ cd tt $ echo 1.1 > foo $ hg ci -Am m $ cd ../t $ echo 1.2 > foo $ hg ci -Am m Should respect config to disable dirty update $ hg co -qC 0 $ echo 2 > foo $ hg --config commands.update.check=abort pull -u ../tt pulling from ../tt searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads) new changesets 107cefe13e42 1 local changesets published abort: uncommitted changes [20] $ hg --config extensions.strip= strip --no-backup tip $ hg co -qC tip Should not update to the other topological branch: $ hg pull -u ../tt pulling from ../tt searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads) new changesets 107cefe13e42 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved updated to "800c91d5bfc1: m" 1 other heads for branch "default" $ cd ../tt Should not update to the other branch: $ hg pull -u ../t pulling from ../t searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (+1 heads) new changesets 800c91d5bfc1 1 local changesets published 0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved updated to "107cefe13e42: m" 1 other heads for branch "default" $ HGMERGE=true hg merge merging foo 0 files updated, 1 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (branch merge, don't forget to commit) $ hg ci -mm $ cd ../t Should work: $ hg pull -u ../tt pulling from ../tt searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files (-1 heads) new changesets 483b76ad4309 1 local changesets published 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved Similarity between "hg update" and "hg pull -u" in handling bookmark ==================================================================== Test that updating activates the bookmark, which matches with the explicit destination of the update. $ echo 4 >> foo $ hg commit -m "#4" $ hg bookmark active-after-pull $ cd ../tt (1) activating by --rev BOOKMARK $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u -r active-after-pull pulling from $TESTTMP/t searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes adding remote bookmark active-after-pull added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets f815b3da6163 1 local changesets published 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (activating bookmark active-after-pull) $ hg parents -q 4:f815b3da6163 $ hg bookmarks * active-after-pull 4:f815b3da6163 active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 (discard pulled changes) $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309 $ hg rollback -q (2) activating by URL#BOOKMARK $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u $TESTTMP/t#active-after-pull pulling from $TESTTMP/t searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes adding remote bookmark active-after-pull added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets f815b3da6163 1 local changesets published 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (activating bookmark active-after-pull) $ hg parents -q 4:f815b3da6163 $ hg bookmarks * active-after-pull 4:f815b3da6163 active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 (discard pulled changes) $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309 $ hg rollback -q Test that updating deactivates current active bookmark, if the destination of the update is explicitly specified, and it doesn't match with the name of any existing bookmarks. $ cd ../t $ hg bookmark -d active-after-pull $ hg branch bar -q $ hg commit -m "#5 (bar #1)" $ cd ../tt (1) deactivating by --rev REV $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u -r b5e4babfaaa7 pulling from $TESTTMP/t searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets f815b3da6163:b5e4babfaaa7 1 local changesets published 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (leaving bookmark active-before-pull) $ hg parents -q 5:b5e4babfaaa7 $ hg bookmarks active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 (discard pulled changes) $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309 $ hg rollback -q (2) deactivating by --branch BRANCH $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u -b bar pulling from $TESTTMP/t searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets f815b3da6163:b5e4babfaaa7 1 local changesets published 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (leaving bookmark active-before-pull) $ hg parents -q 5:b5e4babfaaa7 $ hg bookmarks active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 (discard pulled changes) $ hg update -q 483b76ad4309 $ hg rollback -q (3) deactivating by URL#ANOTHER-BRANCH $ hg bookmark -f active-before-pull $ hg bookmarks * active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ hg pull -u $TESTTMP/t#bar pulling from $TESTTMP/t searching for changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 2 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets f815b3da6163:b5e4babfaaa7 1 local changesets published 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved (leaving bookmark active-before-pull) $ hg parents -q 5:b5e4babfaaa7 $ hg bookmarks active-before-pull 3:483b76ad4309 $ cd .. Issue622: hg init && hg pull -u URL doesn't checkout default branch $ hg init test $ cd test $ echo foo>foo $ hg addremove adding foo $ hg commit -m 1 $ cd .. $ hg init empty $ cd empty $ hg pull -u ../test pulling from ../test requesting all changes adding changesets adding manifests adding file changes added 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files new changesets 340e38bdcde4 1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved