view tests/test-convert-cvs-detectmerge.t @ 46607:e9901d01d135

revlog: add a mechanism to verify expected file position before appending

If someone uses `hg debuglocks`, or some non-hg process writes to the .hg
directory without respecting the locks, or if the repo's on a networked
filesystem, it's possible for the revlog code to write out corrupted data.

The form of this corruption can vary depending on what data was written and how
that happened. We are in the "networked filesystem" case (though I've had users
also do this to themselves with the "`hg debuglocks`" scenario), and most often
see this with the changelog. What ends up happening is we produce two items
(let's call them rev1 and rev2) in the .i file that have the same linkrev,
baserev, and offset into the .d file, while the data in the .d file is appended
properly. rev2's compressed_size is accurate for rev2, but when we go to
decompress the data in the .d file, we use the offset that's recorded in the
index file, which is the same as rev1, and attempt to decompress
rev2.compressed_size bytes of rev1's data. This usually does not succeed. :)

When using inline data, this also fails, though I haven't investigated why too
closely. This shows up as a "patch decode" error. I believe what's happening
there is that we're basically ignoring the offset field, getting the data
properly, but since baserev != rev, it thinks this is a delta based on rev
(instead of a full text) and can't actually apply it as such.

For now, I'm going to make this an optional component and default it to entirely
off. I may increase the default severity of this in the future, once I've
enabled it for my users and we gain more experience with it. Luckily, most of my
users have a versioned filesystem and can roll back to before the corruption has
been written, it's just a hassle to do so and not everyone knows how (so it's a
support burden). Users on other filesystems will not have that luxury, and this
can cause them to have a corrupted repository that they are unlikely to know how
to resolve, and they'll see this as a data-loss event. Refusing to create the
corruption is a much better user experience.

This mechanism is not perfect. There may be false-negatives (racy writes that
are not detected). There should not be any false-positives (non-racy writes that
are detected as such). This is not a mechanism that makes putting a repo on a
networked filesystem "safe" or "supported", just *less* likely to cause
corruption.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9952

#require cvs no-root

Test config convert.cvsps.mergefrom config setting.
(Should test similar mergeto feature, but I don't understand it yet.)
Requires builtin cvsps.

  $ CVSROOT=`pwd`/cvsrepo
  $ export CVSROOT

  $ cvscall()
  > {
  >     cvs -f "$@"
  > }

output of 'cvs ci' varies unpredictably, so just discard it
XXX copied from test-convert-cvs-synthetic

  $ cvsci()
  > {
  >     sleep 1
  >     cvs -f ci "$@" > /dev/null
  > }

XXX copied from test-convert-cvs-synthetic

  $ cat <<EOF >> $HGRCPATH
  > [extensions]
  > convert =
  > [convert]
  > cvsps.cache = 0
  > cvsps.mergefrom = \[MERGE from (\S+)\]
  > EOF

create cvs repository with one project

  $ cvscall -q -d "$CVSROOT" init
  $ mkdir cvsrepo/proj

populate cvs repository

  $ cvscall -Q co proj
  $ cd proj
  $ touch file1
  $ cvscall -Q add file1
  $ cvsci -m"add file1 on trunk"
  cvs commit: Examining .

create two release branches

  $ cvscall -q tag -b v1_0
  T file1
  $ cvscall -q tag -b v1_1
  T file1

modify file1 on branch v1_0

  $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_0
  $ sleep 1
  $ echo "change" >> file1
  $ cvsci -m"add text"
  cvs commit: Examining .

make unrelated change on v1_1

  $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1
  $ touch unrelated
  $ cvscall -Q add unrelated
  $ cvsci -m"unrelated change"
  cvs commit: Examining .

merge file1 to v1_1

  $ cvscall -Q update -jv1_0
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.1.2.1
  Merging differences between 1.1 and 1.1.2.1 into file1
  $ cvsci -m"add text [MERGE from v1_0]"
  cvs commit: Examining .

merge change to trunk

  $ cvscall -Q update -A
  $ cvscall -Q update -jv1_1
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  retrieving revision 1.1
  retrieving revision 1.1.4.1
  Merging differences between 1.1 and 1.1.4.1 into file1
  $ cvsci -m"add text [MERGE from v1_1]"
  cvs commit: Examining .

non-merged change on trunk

  $ echo "foo" > file2
  $ cvscall -Q add file2
  $ cvsci -m"add file2 on trunk" file2

this will create rev 1.3
change on trunk to backport

  $ echo "backport me" >> file1
  $ cvsci -m"add other text" file1
  $ cvscall log file1
  
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  Working file: file1
  head: 1.3
  branch:
  locks: strict
  access list:
  symbolic names:
  	v1_1: 1.1.0.4
  	v1_0: 1.1.0.2
  keyword substitution: kv
  total revisions: 5;	selected revisions: 5
  description:
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.3
  date: * (glob)
  add other text
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.2
  date: * (glob)
  add text [MERGE from v1_1]
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.1
  date: * (glob)
  branches:  1.1.2;  1.1.4;
  add file1 on trunk
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.1.4.1
  date: * (glob)
  add text [MERGE from v1_0]
  ----------------------------
  revision 1.1.2.1
  date: * (glob)
  add text
  =============================================================================

XXX how many ways are there to spell "trunk" with CVS?
backport trunk change to v1_1

  $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1
  $ cvscall -Q update -j1.2 -j1.3 file1
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  retrieving revision 1.2
  retrieving revision 1.3
  Merging differences between 1.2 and 1.3 into file1
  $ cvsci -m"add other text [MERGE from HEAD]" file1

fix bug on v1_1, merge to trunk with error

  $ cvscall -Q update -rv1_1
  $ echo "merge forward" >> file1
  $ cvscall -Q tag unmerged
  $ cvsci -m"fix file1"
  cvs commit: Examining .
  $ cvscall -Q update -A
  $ cvscall -Q update -junmerged -jv1_1
  RCS file: $TESTTMP/cvsrepo/proj/file1,v
  retrieving revision 1.1.4.2
  retrieving revision 1.1.4.3
  Merging differences between 1.1.4.2 and 1.1.4.3 into file1

note the typo in the commit log message

  $ cvsci -m"fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]"
  cvs commit: Examining .
  $ cvs -Q tag -d unmerged

convert to hg

  $ cd ..
  $ hg convert proj proj.hg
  initializing destination proj.hg repository
  connecting to $TESTTMP/cvsrepo
  scanning source...
  collecting CVS rlog
  12 log entries
  creating changesets
  warning: CVS commit message references non-existent branch 'v1-1':
  fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]
  10 changeset entries
  sorting...
  converting...
  9 add file1 on trunk
  8 unrelated change
  7 add text
  6 add text [MERGE from v1_0]
  5 add text [MERGE from v1_1]
  4 add file2 on trunk
  3 add other text
  2 add other text [MERGE from HEAD]
  1 fix file1
  0 fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]

complete log

  $ template="{rev}: '{branches}' {desc}\n"
  $ hg -R proj.hg log --template="$template"
  9: '' fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]
  8: 'v1_1' fix file1
  7: 'v1_1' add other text [MERGE from HEAD]
  6: '' add other text
  5: '' add file2 on trunk
  4: '' add text [MERGE from v1_1]
  3: 'v1_1' add text [MERGE from v1_0]
  2: 'v1_0' add text
  1: 'v1_1' unrelated change
  0: '' add file1 on trunk

graphical log

  $ hg -R proj.hg log -G --template="$template"
  o  9: '' fix file1 [MERGE from v1-1]
  |
  | o  8: 'v1_1' fix file1
  | |
  | o  7: 'v1_1' add other text [MERGE from HEAD]
  |/|
  o |  6: '' add other text
  | |
  o |  5: '' add file2 on trunk
  | |
  o |  4: '' add text [MERGE from v1_1]
  |\|
  | o    3: 'v1_1' add text [MERGE from v1_0]
  | |\
  +---o  2: 'v1_0' add text
  | |
  | o  1: 'v1_1' unrelated change
  |/
  o  0: '' add file1 on trunk