view tests/test-issue3084.t @ 46607:e9901d01d135

revlog: add a mechanism to verify expected file position before appending

If someone uses `hg debuglocks`, or some non-hg process writes to the .hg
directory without respecting the locks, or if the repo's on a networked
filesystem, it's possible for the revlog code to write out corrupted data.

The form of this corruption can vary depending on what data was written and how
that happened. We are in the "networked filesystem" case (though I've had users
also do this to themselves with the "`hg debuglocks`" scenario), and most often
see this with the changelog. What ends up happening is we produce two items
(let's call them rev1 and rev2) in the .i file that have the same linkrev,
baserev, and offset into the .d file, while the data in the .d file is appended
properly. rev2's compressed_size is accurate for rev2, but when we go to
decompress the data in the .d file, we use the offset that's recorded in the
index file, which is the same as rev1, and attempt to decompress
rev2.compressed_size bytes of rev1's data. This usually does not succeed. :)

When using inline data, this also fails, though I haven't investigated why too
closely. This shows up as a "patch decode" error. I believe what's happening
there is that we're basically ignoring the offset field, getting the data
properly, but since baserev != rev, it thinks this is a delta based on rev
(instead of a full text) and can't actually apply it as such.

For now, I'm going to make this an optional component and default it to entirely
off. I may increase the default severity of this in the future, once I've
enabled it for my users and we gain more experience with it. Luckily, most of my
users have a versioned filesystem and can roll back to before the corruption has
been written, it's just a hassle to do so and not everyone knows how (so it's a
support burden). Users on other filesystems will not have that luxury, and this
can cause them to have a corrupted repository that they are unlikely to know how
to resolve, and they'll see this as a data-loss event. Refusing to create the
corruption is a much better user experience.

This mechanism is not perfect. There may be false-negatives (racy writes that
are not detected). There should not be any false-positives (non-racy writes that
are detected as such). This is not a mechanism that makes putting a repo on a
networked filesystem "safe" or "supported", just *less* likely to cause
corruption.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D9952

  $ echo "[extensions]" >> $HGRCPATH
  $ echo "largefiles =" >> $HGRCPATH

Create the repository outside $HOME since largefiles write to
$HOME/.cache/largefiles.

  $ hg init test
  $ cd test
  $ echo "root" > root
  $ hg add root
  $ hg commit -m "Root commit" --config extensions.largefiles=!

Ensure that .hg/largefiles isn't created before largefiles are added
#if unix-permissions
  $ chmod 555 .hg
#endif
  $ hg status
#if unix-permissions
  $ chmod 755 .hg
#endif

  $ test -f .hg/largefiles
  [1]

  $ echo "large" > foo
  $ hg add --large foo
  $ hg commit -m "Add foo as a largefile"

  $ hg update -r 0
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 1 removed
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved

  $ echo "normal" > foo
  $ hg add foo
  $ hg commit -m "Add foo as normal file"
  created new head

Normal file in the working copy, keeping the normal version:

  $ echo "n" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local normal file foo into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status
  $ cat foo
  normal

Normal file in the working copy, keeping the largefile version:

  $ hg update -q -C
  $ echo "l" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local normal file foo into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status
  M foo

  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r fa129ab6b5a7 .hglf/foo
  --- /dev/null
  +++ b/.hglf/foo
  @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
  +7f7097b041ccf68cc5561e9600da4655d21c6d18
  diff -r fa129ab6b5a7 foo
  --- a/foo
  +++ /dev/null
  @@ -1,1 +0,0 @@
  -normal

  $ cat foo
  large

Largefile in the working copy, keeping the normal version:

  $ hg update -q -C -r 1
  $ echo "n" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local largefile foo into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status
  M foo

  $ hg diff --nodates
  diff -r ff521236428a .hglf/foo
  --- a/.hglf/foo
  +++ /dev/null
  @@ -1,1 +0,0 @@
  -7f7097b041ccf68cc5561e9600da4655d21c6d18
  diff -r ff521236428a foo
  --- /dev/null
  +++ b/foo
  @@ -0,0 +1,1 @@
  +normal

  $ cat foo
  normal

Largefile in the working copy, keeping the largefile version:

  $ hg update -q -C -r 1
  $ echo "l" | hg merge --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local largefile foo into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)

  $ hg status

  $ cat foo
  large

Whatever ... commit something so we can invoke merge when updating

  $ hg commit -m '3: Merge'

Updating from largefile to normal - no reason to prompt

  $ hg up -r 2
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cat foo
  normal

(the update above used to leave the working dir in a very weird state - clean it
  $ hg up -qr null
  $ hg up -qr 2
)

Updating from normal to largefile - no reason to prompt

  $ hg up -r 3
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ cat foo
  large

  $ cd ..


Systematic testing of merges involving largefiles:

Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal-id  Parent: large   result: large
Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal2    Parent: large   result: ?
Ancestor: large   Parent: large-id   Parent: normal  result: normal
Ancestor: large   Parent: large2     Parent: normal  result: ?

All cases should try merging both ways.

Prepare test repo:

  $ hg init merges
  $ cd merges

prepare cases with "normal" ancestor:

  $ hg up -qr null
  $ echo normal > f
  $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-ancestor"
  $ hg tag -l "normal-ancestor"
  $ touch f2
  $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-id"
  $ hg tag -l "normal-id"
  $ echo normal2 > f
  $ hg ci -m "normal2"
  $ hg tag -l "normal2"
  $ echo normal > f
  $ hg ci -Aqm "normal-same"
  $ hg tag -l "normal-same"
  $ hg up -qr "normal-ancestor"
  $ hg rm f
  $ echo large > f
  $ hg add --large f
  $ hg ci -qm "large"
  $ hg tag -l "large"

prepare cases with "large" ancestor:

  $ hg up -qr null
  $ echo large > f
  $ hg add --large f
  $ hg ci -qm "large-ancestor"
  $ hg tag -l "large-ancestor"
  $ touch f2
  $ hg ci -Aqm "large-id"
  $ hg tag -l "large-id"
  $ echo large2 > f
  $ hg ci -m "large2"
  $ hg tag -l "large2"
  $ echo large > f
  $ hg ci -Aqm "large-same"
  $ hg tag -l "large-same"
  $ hg up -qr "large-ancestor"
  $ hg rm f
  $ echo normal > f
  $ hg ci -qAm "normal"
  $ hg tag -l "normal"

  $ hg log -GT '{tags}'
  @  normal tip
  |
  | o  large-same
  | |
  | o  large2
  | |
  | o  large-id
  |/
  o  large-ancestor
  
  o  large
  |
  | o  normal-same
  | |
  | o  normal2
  | |
  | o  normal-id
  |/
  o  normal-ancestor
  


Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal-id  Parent: large   result: large

  $ hg up -Cqr normal-id
  $ hg merge -r large
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr large
  $ hg merge -r normal-id
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal-same  Parent: large   result: large

  $ hg up -Cqr normal-same
  $ hg merge -r large
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr large
  $ hg merge -r normal-same
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

Ancestor: normal  Parent: normal2  Parent: large   result: ?
(annoying extra prompt ... but it do not do any serious harm)

  $ hg up -Cqr normal2
  $ hg merge -r large
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

  $ hg up -Cqr normal2
  $ echo n | hg merge -r large --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal2

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr large
  $ hg merge -r normal2
  remote turned local largefile f into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large

  $ hg up -Cqr large
  $ echo n | hg merge -r normal2 --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local largefile f into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal2

Ancestor: large   Parent: large-id   Parent: normal  result: normal

  $ hg up -Cqr large-id
  $ hg merge -r normal
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr normal
  $ hg merge -r large-id
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

Ancestor: large   Parent: large-same   Parent: normal  result: normal

  $ hg up -Cqr large-same
  $ hg merge -r normal
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr normal
  $ hg merge -r large-same
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

Ancestor: large   Parent: large2   Parent: normal  result: ?
(annoying extra prompt ... but it do not do any serious harm)

  $ hg up -Cqr large2
  $ hg merge -r normal
  remote turned local largefile f into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? l
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large2

  $ hg up -Cqr large2
  $ echo n | hg merge -r normal --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local largefile f into a normal file
  keep (l)argefile or use (n)ormal file? n
  getting changed largefiles
  0 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

swap

  $ hg up -Cqr normal
  $ hg merge -r large2
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? l
  getting changed largefiles
  1 largefiles updated, 0 removed
  2 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  large2

  $ hg up -Cqr normal
  $ echo n | hg merge -r large2 --config ui.interactive=Yes
  remote turned local normal file f into a largefile
  use (l)argefile or keep (n)ormal file? n
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  (branch merge, don't forget to commit)
  $ cat f
  normal

  $ cd ..