view mercurial/py3kcompat.py @ 29334:ecc9b788fd69

sslutil: per-host config option to define certificates Recent work has introduced the [hostsecurity] config section for defining per-host security settings. This patch builds on top of this foundation and implements the ability to define a per-host path to a file containing certificates used for verifying the server certificate. It is logically a per-host web.cacerts setting. This patch also introduces a warning when both per-host certificates and fingerprints are defined. These are mutually exclusive for host verification and I think the user should be alerted when security settings are ambiguous because, well, security is important. Tests validating the new behavior have been added. I decided against putting "ca" in the option name because a non-CA certificate can be specified and used to validate the server certificate (commonly this will be the exact public certificate used by the server). It's worth noting that the underlying Python API used is load_verify_locations(cafile=X) and it calls into OpenSSL's SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations(). Even OpenSSL's documentation seems to omit that the file can contain a non-CA certificate if it matches the server's certificate exactly. I thought a CA certificate was a special kind of x509 certificate. Perhaps I'm wrong and any x509 certificate can be used as a CA certificate [as far as OpenSSL is concerned]. In any case, I thought it best to drop "ca" from the name because this reflects reality.
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
date Tue, 07 Jun 2016 20:29:54 -0700
parents 5bfd01a3c2a9
children
line wrap: on
line source

# py3kcompat.py - compatibility definitions for running hg in py3k
#
# Copyright 2010 Renato Cunha <renatoc@gmail.com>
#
# This software may be used and distributed according to the terms of the
# GNU General Public License version 2 or any later version.

from __future__ import absolute_import

import builtins
import numbers

Number = numbers.Number

def bytesformatter(format, args):
    '''Custom implementation of a formatter for bytestrings.

    This function currently relies on the string formatter to do the
    formatting and always returns bytes objects.

    >>> bytesformatter(20, 10)
    0
    >>> bytesformatter('unicode %s, %s!', ('string', 'foo'))
    b'unicode string, foo!'
    >>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', 'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %s', 'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter(b'test %s', b'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %s', b'me')
    b'test me'
    >>> bytesformatter('test %d: %s', (1, b'result'))
    b'test 1: result'
    '''
    # The current implementation just converts from bytes to unicode, do
    # what's needed and then convert the results back to bytes.
    # Another alternative is to use the Python C API implementation.
    if isinstance(format, Number):
        # If the fixer erroneously passes a number remainder operation to
        # bytesformatter, we just return the correct operation
        return format % args
    if isinstance(format, bytes):
        format = format.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    if isinstance(args, bytes):
        args = args.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
    if isinstance(args, tuple):
        newargs = []
        for arg in args:
            if isinstance(arg, bytes):
                arg = arg.decode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
            newargs.append(arg)
        args = tuple(newargs)
    ret = format % args
    return ret.encode('utf-8', 'surrogateescape')
builtins.bytesformatter = bytesformatter

origord = builtins.ord
def fakeord(char):
    if isinstance(char, int):
        return char
    return origord(char)
builtins.ord = fakeord

if __name__ == '__main__':
    import doctest
    doctest.testmod()