view tests/test-fix-metadata.t @ 43962:eebdd6709868

fix: fix handling of merge commits by using overlayworkingctx

Most of this code was conceptually copied from what rebase does, with one small
difference: hgext.rebaserev.rebase uses branchmerge=True, while I had to use
branchmerge=False, or else it got really confused about updating to the same
revision in some situations. I believe that the difference is that rebase is
always dealing with *some* form of update - it never gets to mergemod.update if
the source and destination are the same, while we can encounter that situation
with fix. This may imply that this code has some issues with named branches that
should be investigated.

Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D7703

A python hook for "hg fix" that prints out the number of files and revisions
that were affected, along with which fixer tools were applied. Also checks how
many times it sees a specific key generated by one of the fixer tools defined
below.

  $ cat >> $TESTTMP/postfixhook.py <<EOF
  > import collections
  > def file(ui, repo, rev=None, path=b'', metadata=None, **kwargs):
  >   ui.status(b'fixed %s in revision %d using %s\n' %
  >             (path, rev, b', '.join(metadata.keys())))
  > def summarize(ui, repo, replacements=None, wdirwritten=False,
  >               metadata=None, **kwargs):
  >     counts = collections.defaultdict(int)
  >     keys = 0
  >     for fixername, metadatalist in metadata.items():
  >         for metadata in metadatalist:
  >             if metadata is None:
  >                 continue
  >             counts[fixername] += 1
  >             if 'key' in metadata:
  >                 keys += 1
  >     ui.status(b'saw "key" %d times\n' % (keys,))
  >     for name, count in sorted(counts.items()):
  >         ui.status(b'fixed %d files with %s\n' % (count, name))
  >     if replacements:
  >         ui.status(b'fixed %d revisions\n' % (len(replacements),))
  >     if wdirwritten:
  >         ui.status(b'fixed the working copy\n')
  > EOF

Some mock output for fixer tools that demonstrate what could go wrong with
expecting the metadata output format.

  $ printf 'new content\n' > $TESTTMP/missing
  $ printf 'not valid json\0new content\n' > $TESTTMP/invalid
  $ printf '{"key": "value"}\0new content\n' > $TESTTMP/valid

Configure some fixer tools based on the output defined above, and enable the
hooks defined above. Disable parallelism to make output of the parallel file
processing phase stable.

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > fix =
  > [fix]
  > metadatafalse:command=cat $TESTTMP/missing
  > metadatafalse:pattern=metadatafalse
  > metadatafalse:metadata=false
  > missing:command=cat $TESTTMP/missing
  > missing:pattern=missing
  > missing:metadata=true
  > invalid:command=cat $TESTTMP/invalid
  > invalid:pattern=invalid
  > invalid:metadata=true
  > valid:command=cat $TESTTMP/valid
  > valid:pattern=valid
  > valid:metadata=true
  > [hooks]
  > postfixfile = python:$TESTTMP/postfixhook.py:file
  > postfix = python:$TESTTMP/postfixhook.py:summarize
  > [worker]
  > enabled=false
  > EOF

See what happens when we execute each of the fixer tools. Some print warnings,
some write back to the file.

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo

  $ printf "old content\n" > metadatafalse
  $ printf "old content\n" > invalid
  $ printf "old content\n" > missing
  $ printf "old content\n" > valid
  $ hg add -q

  $ hg fix -w
  ignored invalid output from fixer tool: invalid
  fixed metadatafalse in revision 2147483647 using metadatafalse
  ignored invalid output from fixer tool: missing
  fixed valid in revision 2147483647 using valid
  saw "key" 1 times
  fixed 1 files with valid
  fixed the working copy

  $ cat metadatafalse
  new content
  $ cat missing
  old content
  $ cat invalid
  old content
  $ cat valid
  new content

  $ cd ..