glob:<directory> patterns match the files in that directory.
This makes the behaviour of glob: patterns more consistent:
hg status glob:dir and hg status -I glob:dir will match
the same files.
It's also consistent with the fact that {rel,}path patterns
recursively match the contents of a directory.
hg status in repo root:
? a/1/in_a_1
? a/in_a
? b/1/in_b_1
? b/2/in_b_2
? b/in_b
? in_root
hg status . in repo root:
? a/1/in_a_1
? a/in_a
? b/1/in_b_1
? b/2/in_b_2
? b/in_b
? in_root
hg status in a:
? a/1/in_a_1
? a/in_a
? b/1/in_b_1
? b/2/in_b_2
? b/in_b
? in_root
hg status . in a:
? 1/in_a_1
? in_a
hg status .. in a:
? 1/in_a_1
? in_a
? ../b/1/in_b_1
? ../b/2/in_b_2
? ../b/in_b
? ../in_root
hg status in b:
? a/1/in_a_1
? a/in_a
? b/1/in_b_1
? b/2/in_b_2
? b/in_b
? in_root
hg status . in b:
? 1/in_b_1
? 2/in_b_2
? in_b
hg status .. in b:
? ../a/1/in_a_1
? ../a/in_a
? 1/in_b_1
? 2/in_b_2
? in_b
? ../in_root
hg status in a/1:
? a/1/in_a_1
? a/in_a
? b/1/in_b_1
? b/2/in_b_2
? b/in_b
? in_root
hg status . in a/1:
? in_a_1
hg status .. in a/1:
? in_a_1
? ../in_a
hg status in b/1:
? a/1/in_a_1
? a/in_a
? b/1/in_b_1
? b/2/in_b_2
? b/in_b
? in_root
hg status . in b/1:
? in_b_1
hg status .. in b/1:
? in_b_1
? ../2/in_b_2
? ../in_b
hg status in b/2:
? a/1/in_a_1
? a/in_a
? b/1/in_b_1
? b/2/in_b_2
? b/in_b
? in_root
hg status . in b/2:
? in_b_2
hg status .. in b/2:
? ../1/in_b_1
? in_b_2
? ../in_b
adding .hgignore
adding deleted
adding modified
adding removed
hg status:
A added
R removed
! deleted
? unknown
hg status modified added removed deleted unknown never-existed ignored:
never-existed: No such file or directory
A added
R removed
! deleted
? ignored
? unknown
hg status -C:
A added
A copied
modified
R removed
! deleted
? unknown
hg status -A:
A added
A copied
modified
R removed
! deleted
? unknown
I ignored
C .hgignore
C modified