util: lower water mark when removing nodes after cost limit reached
See the inline comment for the reasoning here. This is a pretty
common strategy for garbage collectors, other cache-like primtives.
The performance impact is substantial:
$ hg perflrucachedict --size 4 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 100
! inserts w/ cost limit
! wall 1.659181 comb 1.650000 user 1.650000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7)
! wall 1.722122 comb 1.720000 user 1.720000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6)
! mixed w/ cost limit
! wall 1.139955 comb 1.140000 user 1.140000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9)
! wall 1.182513 comb 1.180000 user 1.180000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9)
$ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000
! inserts
! wall 0.679546 comb 0.680000 user 0.680000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15)
! sets
! wall 0.825147 comb 0.830000 user 0.830000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)
! inserts w/ cost limit
! wall 25.105273 comb 25.080000 user 25.080000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3)
! wall 1.724397 comb 1.720000 user 1.720000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6)
! mixed
! wall 0.807096 comb 0.810000 user 0.810000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)
! mixed w/ cost limit
! wall 12.104470 comb 12.070000 user 12.070000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3)
! wall 1.190563 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9)
$ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000 --mixedgetfreq 90
! inserts
! wall 0.711177 comb 0.710000 user 0.710000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14)
! sets
! wall 0.846992 comb 0.850000 user 0.850000 sys 0.000000 (best of 12)
! inserts w/ cost limit
! wall 25.963028 comb 25.960000 user 25.960000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3)
! wall 2.184311 comb 2.180000 user 2.180000 sys 0.000000 (best of 5)
! mixed
! wall 0.728256 comb 0.730000 user 0.730000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14)
! mixed w/ cost limit
! wall 3.174256 comb 3.170000 user 3.170000 sys 0.000000 (best of 4)
! wall 0.773186 comb 0.770000 user 0.770000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13)
$ hg perflrucachedict --size 100000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --mixedgetfreq 90 --costlimit 5000000
! gets
! wall 1.191368 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9)
! wall 1.195304 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9)
! inserts
! wall 0.950995 comb 0.950000 user 0.950000 sys 0.000000 (best of 11)
! inserts w/ cost limit
! wall 1.589732 comb 1.590000 user 1.590000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7)
! sets
! wall 1.094941 comb 1.100000 user 1.090000 sys 0.010000 (best of 9)
! mixed
! wall 0.936420 comb 0.940000 user 0.930000 sys 0.010000 (best of 10)
! mixed w/ cost limit
! wall 0.882780 comb 0.870000 user 0.870000 sys 0.000000 (best of 11)
This puts us ~2x slower than caches without cost accounting. And for
read-heavy workloads (the prime use cases for caches), performance is
nearly identical.
In the worst case (pure write workloads with cost accounting enabled),
we're looking at ~1.5us per insert on large caches. That seems "fast
enough."
Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4505
Create a repository:
#if no-extraextensions
$ hg config
devel.all-warnings=true
devel.default-date=0 0
extensions.fsmonitor= (fsmonitor !)
largefiles.usercache=$TESTTMP/.cache/largefiles
lfs.usercache=$TESTTMP/.cache/lfs
ui.slash=True
ui.interactive=False
ui.mergemarkers=detailed
ui.promptecho=True
web.address=localhost
web\.ipv6=(?:True|False) (re)
web.server-header=testing stub value
#endif
$ hg init t
$ cd t
Prepare a changeset:
$ echo a > a
$ hg add a
$ hg status
A a
Writes to stdio succeed and fail appropriately
#if devfull
$ hg status 2>/dev/full
A a
$ hg status >/dev/full
abort: No space left on device
[255]
#endif
#if devfull
$ hg status >/dev/full 2>&1
[255]
$ hg status ENOENT 2>/dev/full
[255]
#endif
$ hg commit -m test
This command is ancient:
$ hg history
changeset: 0:acb14030fe0a
tag: tip
user: test
date: Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
summary: test
Verify that updating to revision 0 via commands.update() works properly
$ cat <<EOF > update_to_rev0.py
> from mercurial import ui, hg, commands
> myui = ui.ui.load()
> repo = hg.repository(myui, path=b'.')
> commands.update(myui, repo, rev=b"0")
> EOF
$ hg up null
0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ $PYTHON ./update_to_rev0.py
1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
$ hg identify -n
0
Poke around at hashes:
$ hg manifest --debug
b789fdd96dc2f3bd229c1dd8eedf0fc60e2b68e3 644 a
$ hg cat a
a
Verify should succeed:
$ hg verify
checking changesets
checking manifests
crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
checking files
checked 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files
Repository root:
$ hg root
$TESTTMP/t
$ hg log -l1 -T '{reporoot}\n'
$TESTTMP/t
At the end...
$ cd ..