tests/test-basic.t
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
Thu, 06 Sep 2018 18:04:27 -0700
changeset 39570 f296c0b366c8
parent 39489 f1186c292d03
child 39707 5abc47d4ca6b
permissions -rw-r--r--
util: lower water mark when removing nodes after cost limit reached See the inline comment for the reasoning here. This is a pretty common strategy for garbage collectors, other cache-like primtives. The performance impact is substantial: $ hg perflrucachedict --size 4 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 100 ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 1.659181 comb 1.650000 user 1.650000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! wall 1.722122 comb 1.720000 user 1.720000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 1.139955 comb 1.140000 user 1.140000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! wall 1.182513 comb 1.180000 user 1.180000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000 ! inserts ! wall 0.679546 comb 0.680000 user 0.680000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15) ! sets ! wall 0.825147 comb 0.830000 user 0.830000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 25.105273 comb 25.080000 user 25.080000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 1.724397 comb 1.720000 user 1.720000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6) ! mixed ! wall 0.807096 comb 0.810000 user 0.810000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 12.104470 comb 12.070000 user 12.070000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 1.190563 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000 --mixedgetfreq 90 ! inserts ! wall 0.711177 comb 0.710000 user 0.710000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14) ! sets ! wall 0.846992 comb 0.850000 user 0.850000 sys 0.000000 (best of 12) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 25.963028 comb 25.960000 user 25.960000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 2.184311 comb 2.180000 user 2.180000 sys 0.000000 (best of 5) ! mixed ! wall 0.728256 comb 0.730000 user 0.730000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 3.174256 comb 3.170000 user 3.170000 sys 0.000000 (best of 4) ! wall 0.773186 comb 0.770000 user 0.770000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 100000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --mixedgetfreq 90 --costlimit 5000000 ! gets ! wall 1.191368 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! wall 1.195304 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! inserts ! wall 0.950995 comb 0.950000 user 0.950000 sys 0.000000 (best of 11) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 1.589732 comb 1.590000 user 1.590000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! sets ! wall 1.094941 comb 1.100000 user 1.090000 sys 0.010000 (best of 9) ! mixed ! wall 0.936420 comb 0.940000 user 0.930000 sys 0.010000 (best of 10) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 0.882780 comb 0.870000 user 0.870000 sys 0.000000 (best of 11) This puts us ~2x slower than caches without cost accounting. And for read-heavy workloads (the prime use cases for caches), performance is nearly identical. In the worst case (pure write workloads with cost accounting enabled), we're looking at ~1.5us per insert on large caches. That seems "fast enough." Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4505

Create a repository:

#if no-extraextensions
  $ hg config
  devel.all-warnings=true
  devel.default-date=0 0
  extensions.fsmonitor= (fsmonitor !)
  largefiles.usercache=$TESTTMP/.cache/largefiles
  lfs.usercache=$TESTTMP/.cache/lfs
  ui.slash=True
  ui.interactive=False
  ui.mergemarkers=detailed
  ui.promptecho=True
  web.address=localhost
  web\.ipv6=(?:True|False) (re)
  web.server-header=testing stub value
#endif

  $ hg init t
  $ cd t

Prepare a changeset:

  $ echo a > a
  $ hg add a

  $ hg status
  A a

Writes to stdio succeed and fail appropriately

#if devfull
  $ hg status 2>/dev/full
  A a

  $ hg status >/dev/full
  abort: No space left on device
  [255]
#endif

#if devfull
  $ hg status >/dev/full 2>&1
  [255]

  $ hg status ENOENT 2>/dev/full
  [255]
#endif

  $ hg commit -m test

This command is ancient:

  $ hg history
  changeset:   0:acb14030fe0a
  tag:         tip
  user:        test
  date:        Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
  summary:     test
  

Verify that updating to revision 0 via commands.update() works properly

  $ cat <<EOF > update_to_rev0.py
  > from mercurial import ui, hg, commands
  > myui = ui.ui.load()
  > repo = hg.repository(myui, path=b'.')
  > commands.update(myui, repo, rev=b"0")
  > EOF
  $ hg up null
  0 files updated, 0 files merged, 1 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ $PYTHON ./update_to_rev0.py
  1 files updated, 0 files merged, 0 files removed, 0 files unresolved
  $ hg identify -n
  0


Poke around at hashes:

  $ hg manifest --debug
  b789fdd96dc2f3bd229c1dd8eedf0fc60e2b68e3 644   a

  $ hg cat a
  a

Verify should succeed:

  $ hg verify
  checking changesets
  checking manifests
  crosschecking files in changesets and manifests
  checking files
  checked 1 changesets with 1 changes to 1 files

Repository root:

  $ hg root
  $TESTTMP/t
  $ hg log -l1 -T '{reporoot}\n'
  $TESTTMP/t

At the end...

  $ cd ..