Mercurial Mercurial > hg / file revision
summary | shortlog | changelog | graph | tags | bookmarks | branches | files | changeset | file | latest | revisions | annotate | diff | comparison | raw | help
Find changesets by keywords (author, files, the commit message), revision number or hash, or revset expression.
tests/test-histedit-templates.t
author Gregory Szorc <gregory.szorc@gmail.com>
Thu, 06 Sep 2018 18:04:27 -0700
changeset 39570 f296c0b366c8
parent 35126 a9cc233de513
permissions -rw-r--r--
util: lower water mark when removing nodes after cost limit reached See the inline comment for the reasoning here. This is a pretty common strategy for garbage collectors, other cache-like primtives. The performance impact is substantial: $ hg perflrucachedict --size 4 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 100 ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 1.659181 comb 1.650000 user 1.650000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! wall 1.722122 comb 1.720000 user 1.720000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 1.139955 comb 1.140000 user 1.140000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! wall 1.182513 comb 1.180000 user 1.180000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000 ! inserts ! wall 0.679546 comb 0.680000 user 0.680000 sys 0.000000 (best of 15) ! sets ! wall 0.825147 comb 0.830000 user 0.830000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 25.105273 comb 25.080000 user 25.080000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 1.724397 comb 1.720000 user 1.720000 sys 0.000000 (best of 6) ! mixed ! wall 0.807096 comb 0.810000 user 0.810000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 12.104470 comb 12.070000 user 12.070000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 1.190563 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 1000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --costlimit 10000 --mixedgetfreq 90 ! inserts ! wall 0.711177 comb 0.710000 user 0.710000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14) ! sets ! wall 0.846992 comb 0.850000 user 0.850000 sys 0.000000 (best of 12) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 25.963028 comb 25.960000 user 25.960000 sys 0.000000 (best of 3) ! wall 2.184311 comb 2.180000 user 2.180000 sys 0.000000 (best of 5) ! mixed ! wall 0.728256 comb 0.730000 user 0.730000 sys 0.000000 (best of 14) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 3.174256 comb 3.170000 user 3.170000 sys 0.000000 (best of 4) ! wall 0.773186 comb 0.770000 user 0.770000 sys 0.000000 (best of 13) $ hg perflrucachedict --size 100000 --gets 1000000 --sets 1000000 --mixed 1000000 --mixedgetfreq 90 --costlimit 5000000 ! gets ! wall 1.191368 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! wall 1.195304 comb 1.190000 user 1.190000 sys 0.000000 (best of 9) ! inserts ! wall 0.950995 comb 0.950000 user 0.950000 sys 0.000000 (best of 11) ! inserts w/ cost limit ! wall 1.589732 comb 1.590000 user 1.590000 sys 0.000000 (best of 7) ! sets ! wall 1.094941 comb 1.100000 user 1.090000 sys 0.010000 (best of 9) ! mixed ! wall 0.936420 comb 0.940000 user 0.930000 sys 0.010000 (best of 10) ! mixed w/ cost limit ! wall 0.882780 comb 0.870000 user 0.870000 sys 0.000000 (best of 11) This puts us ~2x slower than caches without cost accounting. And for read-heavy workloads (the prime use cases for caches), performance is nearly identical. In the worst case (pure write workloads with cost accounting enabled), we're looking at ~1.5us per insert on large caches. That seems "fast enough." Differential Revision: https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D4505

Testing templating for histedit command

Setup

  $ cat >> $HGRCPATH <<EOF
  > [extensions]
  > histedit=
  > [experimental]
  > evolution=createmarkers
  > EOF

  $ hg init repo
  $ cd repo
  $ for ch in a b c d; do echo foo > $ch; hg commit -Aqm "Added "$ch; done

  $ hg log -G -T "{rev}:{node|short} {desc}"
  @  3:62615734edd5 Added d
  |
  o  2:28ad74487de9 Added c
  |
  o  1:29becc82797a Added b
  |
  o  0:18d04c59bb5d Added a
  
Getting the JSON output for nodechanges

  $ hg histedit -Tjson --commands - 2>&1 <<EOF
  > pick 28ad74487de9 Added c
  > pick 62615734edd5 Added d
  > pick 18d04c59bb5d Added a
  > pick 29becc82797a Added b
  > EOF
  [
   {
    "nodechanges": {"18d04c59bb5d2d4090ad9a5b59bd6274adb63add": ["109f8ec895447f81b380ba8d4d8b66539ccdcb94"], "28ad74487de9599d00d81085be739c61fc340652": ["bff9e07c1807942b161dab768aa793b48e9a7f9d"], "29becc82797a4bc11ec8880b58eaecd2ab3e7760": ["f5dcf3b4db23f31f1aacf46c33d1393de303d26f"], "62615734edd52f06b6fb9c2beb429e4fe30d57b8": ["201423b441c84d9e6858daed653e0d22485c1cfa"]}
   }
  ]

  $ hg log -G -T "{rev}:{node|short} {desc}"
  @  7:f5dcf3b4db23 Added b
  |
  o  6:109f8ec89544 Added a
  |
  o  5:201423b441c8 Added d
  |
  o  4:bff9e07c1807 Added c
  
  $ hg histedit -T "{nodechanges|json}" --commands - 2>&1 <<EOF
  > pick bff9e07c1807 Added c
  > pick 201423b441c8 Added d
  > pick 109f8ec89544 Added a
  > roll f5dcf3b4db23 Added b
  > EOF
  {"109f8ec895447f81b380ba8d4d8b66539ccdcb94": ["8d01470bfeab64d3de13c49adb79d88790d38396"], "f3ec56a374bdbdf1953cacca505161442c6f3a3e": [], "f5dcf3b4db23f31f1aacf46c33d1393de303d26f": ["8d01470bfeab64d3de13c49adb79d88790d38396"]} (no-eol)
Mercurial